Myths, Misconceptions and Mistakes in the Electrostatic Protection of Field-Sensitive Items #x2013; Why It#x2019;s Time to Re-Visit Device Protection
Keywords:
Abstract
The measures currently being taken to prevent electrostatic damage in semiconductor manufacturing environments are not sufficient to guarantee the complete protection of items that are highly sensitive to electric field. Mistakes that have been made in the interpretation of electrostatic damage phenomena in manufacturing and errors that have been made in attempting to provide protection against them are described. It is shown that some of the ESD countermeasures in widespread use today can actually increase the electrostatic risk for fieldsensitive items. The static dissipative materials that are commonly used to make pods and transport boxes are shown to expose field-sensitive items to a significant risk that can result in cumulative and permanent damage. It is concluded that more research into semiconductor device electrostatic damage mechanisms other than ESD is urgently needed, as has previously been called for by researchers studying the problem. It is also recommended that the electrostatic countermeasures being used in device manufacturing and handling should be reviewed and revised where necessary, to improve the protection of all extremely-electrostaticsensitive (EES) items.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
Published
2021-07-15
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.