\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Ship Structural Integrity of Aluminium Stiffener Panel for Consequence Reduction}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2012-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2012)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2012-01-15} \title{Ship Structural Integrity of Aluminium Stiffener Panel for Consequence Reduction} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Dr. O. O. Sulaiman} \author[2]{A.H. Saharuddin} \author[3]{W.B.Wan Nick} \affil[1]{ University Teknologi Malaysia} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 13 December 2011 Accepted: 1 January 2012 Published: 15 January 2012} \maketitle \begin{abstract} The aluminium stiffener panels in ship structure are paramount to ensure safety and to guarantee the structural strength and integrity of the ship. The aluminium stiffener panel is very important to ship building, especially when the ship faces collision or unstabilized structure; the aluminium stiffener panel tends to increase bending moment, vertical shear force and stresses. This study investigate the strength of the aluminium stiffener panel at the amidship bulkhead with different shapes and typesin order to determine the strength of the aluminium stiffener from its features. AA 5083-H116 aluminium stiffener panel used has been approved by the recognized organization for shipbuilding. The aluminium stiffener panel has been tested using bending moment test and compressive load to obtain the highest endurance. Three types of aluminium stiffener panels, which are a flat shaped, L-shaped and T-shaped panel, are used in order to obtain the best panel ability for a better ship structural system. The aluminium stiffener panel is tested at the area where it is different to determine area where they are affected by extreme heat due to the welding results and fabrication. The result has showed that the aluminium stiffener panel in shipbuilding process effect in an area without extreme heat is more stable. \end{abstract} \keywords{Ultimate strength, heat affected zone, collision damage, aluminium stiffener panel, bulkhead, amidships.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par a) Background he stiffener panel on ship structure is one of the support element from basic of building ship structure such as type flat bar, T bar and L bar used in shipbuilding construction, they are used commonly in the bulkhead and amidships. Study on ship strength and integrity determined from life cycle of ship and return of investment leads to ship own or spending more money on maintenance. Stiffened plates in ships revealed that other structures may be exposed to complex stress patterns due to simultaneously acting in-plane biaxial and shear stresses in design of such elements, buckling and ultimate strength are important issues researched by Brubak, L. and Hellesland J. {\ref (2008)}. Stiffened plates are required to resist extreme loading conditions, for example in term of axial compressive loads or lateral pressures studied by Khedmati M.R., and Ghavami K. {\ref (2009)}. The principal variables studied are the plate thickness, boundary conditions and the stiffener geometries beside the geometrical imperfection, the width of the welding heataffected zone (HAZ) and welding residual stresses are also examined.\par The study involved of ship structure construction and testing of different part of aluminium stiffener panel to investigate be more strength because they can cause support load weight on the ship such as machinery, fuel, oil and other equipment. Aluminium stiffener should be more strengthen for support the ship body, Therefore, it is important to find ship structure in respect to fatigue todetermine structural integrity. b) Inherent Problem Associated with Ship Structure integrity i.\par The variation in the buoyant forces increased the bending moment, vertical shear force, , stresses and amidships the buoyancy forces design in such situation will tend to 'hog' the vessel, if the trough is amidships the buoyancy forces will tend to 'sag' the ship. ii.\par The stiffness against bending tend to increased by a hollow section with space between the stiffeners which is reduced by the twin-wall section shape compared to the single-wall stiffeners such as T-shaped or L-shaped stipulated by Ye N. and Moan T. (2007).\par iii. Fatigue becomes the governing criteria in the design of the mid-ship stiffener/web frame connections at the top and bottom has studied by \hyperref[b3]{Ye N. (2007)}.\par The study asses ship structurereliability strength of aluminium stiffener panel from outside pressure and consequential damages. The study investigated the aluminium stiffener strength by shape and type of stiffener at bulkheads and amidships and determined reliable effect of aluminium stiffener strength from their behavior. \section[{II.}]{II.} \section[{Methodology}]{Methodology}\par The study process involves the following stages: a) Theoretical Modeling\par The theory of stress and strain is compared with the value of lab test for validation purpose to deduce and recommendation as required. Compressive stress acts to reduce the length of the material (compression member) in the axis of the applied load is modelled. \section[{b) Field Work at Shipyard}]{b) Field Work at Shipyard}\par The plate of aluminium alloys 5083-H116 was prepared at shipyard before the construction the aluminium stiffener panel. The plate is cut and preparedto get the dimension based on the ship requirement. Aluminium stiffener is resized to deduce the parameter smaller than panel dimension suitable for the tester machine. The methods for fabricating aluminium stiffener panel are presented by MIG welding technique. \section[{c) Laboratory Test Panel}]{c) Laboratory Test Panel}\par The aluminium stiffener panel work at shipyard as followed by determination of the type and dimension. A three panel with L-shaped, T-shaped and flat shaped stiffeners fabricated from extruded aluminium profiles in alloy AA5083-H116, joined by welding, was defined. \section[{d) Compression Test}]{d) Compression Test}\par The method of research to determined behavior of materials under crushing loads. Compressive stress and strain is calculated and plotted as a stress-strain diagram test purposed to determine ultimate strength of aluminium stiffener panel under load. The result determined when the frequency of breakage or limit of aluminium stiffener panel test. The specimen was prepared to test at universal testing machine the best environmental condition. For aluminium stiffener, good condition and room temperature to avoid the other effect on the test specimen is providing for the test. \section[{e) Bending Test}]{e) Bending Test}\par Three-point bending test involve involved simple two-dimensional analysis of a simply supported aluminium stiffener panel loaded. The formation of the process zone and failure of the specimen are simulated in aluminium stiffener dimension steps, controlled by the displacement under the applied load. The loaddisplacement diagram is deduced as final result for bending test. \section[{f) Heat Affected Zone Test}]{f) Heat Affected Zone Test}\par The test specimen was conducted by hardness test to find the material properties in aluminium stiffener panel and material composition in the welding process.\par The Vickers hardness test is conducted to measuring and assesses the extent of the structural weakness. The Hardness test required for welding process for construction of all type of aluminium stiffener panel. The Vickers Hardness test measurement was produced at allocated aluminium stiffener panel welding process for measurement on effected zone on panel extrusion. \section[{g) Data Acquisation and analysis}]{g) Data Acquisation and analysis}\par The analysede for bending, compression test and Vickers hardness measurement has provided. The numerical analysis based on the result that was obtained from the compression test is provided. The theoretical modeling provided thetheoretical and formulation of aluminium stiffener panel compressive strength. The comparison data from the compression test deduced the different of imperfection and fatigue of material strength. The reliable effect on aluminium stiffener panel from their behaviour with the characteristic of each type of stiffener panel dimension has determined. The classification society validation requirement process approval the license and ship seaworthiness is used for necessary checking of the result. \section[{III.}]{III.} \section[{Result and Discussion}]{Result and Discussion} \section[{a) Stiffener Panel Dimension}]{a) Stiffener Panel Dimension}\par Stiffener panel dimension is calculated theoretically according to suggested requirement and comparison is made. The bending test require the dimension of aluminium stiffener panel the values of thickness and area of body applied load, A. The length of specimen, L is same and width of specimen, b. The range of dimension L/b is 6.9 of each specimen.\par The total overall dimension for aluminium stiffener panel is likely to be the same with the bending test. The measurement weight of specimen, W slightly different and thickness of stiffener is also different. The flat bar (fb) is 3mm, T-bar (tb) is 4mm and angle bar (lb) is 5mm. The range of measurement is L/b that is 0.9 respectively. The aluminium stiffener panel has a cross sectional area with their body platting, have the area of dimension, sectional dimension of stiffener panel and type stiffener panel difference values and arrangement. The cross sectional area is analysed in Table \hyperref[tab_0]{4}.3 with specimen is considered. The final value of test response by bending test is shown in Table \hyperref[tab_0]{4}.5. This is required to determine the ultimate capacity load with the sample of specimen. The comparison has achieved their properties and strength values, the ultimate strength break the applied load with the stiffener panel. The aluminium stiffener is the most important in the local strength because the part is stable in that area and produced the higher strength and very reliable to use in the bulkhead amidships to prevent the consequential damage from outside. \section[{ii. Compression Test}]{ii. Compression Test}\par The result of angle bar process has show that is 8.671 kN was used to pressure the aluminium stiffener panel for testing the strength of aluminium stiffener panel. The higher load required for machine needs more applied load to damage their body until 4742.487 kN recorded. Finally the ultimate load applied with the body 5233.571 kN for the angle bar specimen has recorded. The graph of compressive load against strain is shown in figure 4.4. \hyperref[tab_0]{4}.9 showS the final result for compression test for requirement of test response determined a functional of each specimen in various side. The result has expected the difference in type of aluminium stiffener panel iss defined and determine the strength of aluminium stiffener panel in difference of ultimate strength. The variable of aluminium stiffener panel has required the energy of load collision in ship structure requirement of structural damage has reconsidered by owner ship to determine a value and loss of damage in their body. In the element of load of collision, the theoretical modeling energy of ship tonnage and energy load of collision is provided by the equation: The result showed that the aluminium stiffener panel area with lower heat is more stable and has reliability for approve in ship structural system. The stiffener panel strength isdetermined by the ultimate strength of the load collision applied. The effect of stiffener height on average tears length for the weld configuration shows increasing tearing threshold for a decreasing stiffener height. The deformation is slightly a symmetric with the centre in the plate and proceeds along the stiffener, when the tear reaches the weld it deviates around the weld and then proceeds along the weld and plate intersection. The importance of structural dimension of specimen prevents the outside pressure from structural damage and collapse. b) Recommendations i. The following recommendation is proposed for future improvement of this study Firstly, the actual design study compared application to a ship structure design. Also, prediction of the possible impact on structural design, development arising from these conditions is that navies have increasingly turned to the application of classification society processes and resources to help them in establishing and applying technical criteria for naval ship design and construction including those related to the ship structure. Furthermore, the study of innovative designs for maximum the crashworthiness in an accidental impact is necessary. Lastly, probabilistic approach to consequent evaluation of damaged stability and vessel survivability can be researched from this study.E T (mJ) = ½ × (M stiff V²) k -1 E load (mJ) = E T /2 (M stiff V²) -2\par ii.\begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}Graph 4 .}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{41}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png} \caption{\label{fig_1}Figure 4 . 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png} \caption{\label{fig_2}Figure 4 .}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{42}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png} \caption{\label{fig_3}Figure 4 . 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4}\includegraphics[]{image-6.png} \caption{\label{fig_4}Figure 4 .}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{43}\includegraphics[]{image-7.png} \caption{\label{fig_5}Figure 4 . 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{44}\includegraphics[]{image-8.png} \caption{\label{fig_6}Figure 4 . 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{45}\includegraphics[]{image-9.png} \caption{\label{fig_7}Figure 4 . 5 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{46}\includegraphics[]{image-10.png} \caption{\label{fig_8}Figure 4 . 6 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-11.png} \caption{\label{fig_9}Ship}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.18478260869565216\textwidth}P{0.5691304347826087\textwidth}P{0.02217391304347826\textwidth}P{0.01108695652173913\textwidth}P{0.01108695652173913\textwidth}P{0.02217391304347826\textwidth}P{0.01108695652173913\textwidth}P{0.018478260869565215\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{3 : Cross-Sectional Area Type Of Aluminium Stiffener Panel}\tabcellsep \\ Type specimen\tabcellsep \multicolumn{7}{l}{Cross-section (nominal values) a (mm) b (mm) t (mm) t w (mm) h w (mm) t f (mm) b f (mm)}\\ Flar bar (fb)\tabcellsep 345\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 51\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\\ T-bar (tb)\tabcellsep 345\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 47\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 50\\ Angle bar (lb)\tabcellsep 345\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 46\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 50\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: © 2012 Global Journals Inc. (US)]} \caption{\label{tab_0}Table 4 .}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.3972826086956522\textwidth}P{0.09239130434782608\textwidth}P{0.058514492753623186\textwidth}P{0.11702898550724637\textwidth}P{0.07391304347826086\textwidth}P{0.0030797101449275364\textwidth}P{0.10778985507246377\textwidth}} Type Specimen\tabcellsep I (mm 4 )\tabcellsep r\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Stiffened plate ß}\tabcellsep ?\tabcellsep W 0 max /L (×10 -3 )\\ Flar bar (fb)\tabcellsep 33162.7\tabcellsep 5.6604\tabcellsep 0.87966\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.001023}\tabcellsep 0.449\\ T-bar (tb)\tabcellsep 34607.6\tabcellsep 5.0077\tabcellsep 0.65974\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.001157}\tabcellsep 0.252\\ Angle bar (lb)\tabcellsep 40556.7\tabcellsep 4.8488\tabcellsep 0.52779\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.001195}\tabcellsep 0.161\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{b) Ultimate Strength And Maximum Load On}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Aluminium Stiffener Type\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ i. Bending Test\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_1}Table 4 .}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{45} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.12844444444444444\textwidth}P{0.12844444444444444\textwidth}P{0.11711111111111111\textwidth}P{0.2833333333333333\textwidth}P{0.056666666666666664\textwidth}P{0.136\textwidth}} Type specimen\tabcellsep Max. Load,k (N/mm²)\tabcellsep Deflection (mm)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Test Response Break,k Elastic Modulus,E (N) (N/mm²)}\tabcellsep Yield Strength (N/mm²)\\ Flat bar\tabcellsep 0.051\tabcellsep 5.952\tabcellsep 6513.113\tabcellsep 0.091\tabcellsep 0.16\\ Tbar\tabcellsep 0.185\tabcellsep 15.030\tabcellsep 36077.32\tabcellsep 0.332\tabcellsep 0.184\\ Angle bar\tabcellsep 0.042\tabcellsep 4.537\tabcellsep 9445.379\tabcellsep 0.076\tabcellsep 0.114\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_2}Table 4 . 5 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{49} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.05250965250965251\textwidth}P{0.0886100386100386\textwidth}P{0.09845559845559845\textwidth}P{0.10501930501930502\textwidth}P{0.11814671814671815\textwidth}P{0.10501930501930502\textwidth}P{0.11814671814671815\textwidth}P{0.09845559845559845\textwidth}P{0.06563706563706563\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Test Response}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Type\tabcellsep E (N/mm²)\tabcellsep Yield point (N)\tabcellsep Max.load Fu (N/mm²)\tabcellsep Break (N)\tabcellsep Extension Vu (mm)\tabcellsep Stress ? u (kN/mm 2 )\tabcellsep Strain ? u (\%)\tabcellsep kb/EA\\ (fb)\tabcellsep 20.701\tabcellsep 19090\tabcellsep 0.23\tabcellsep 4696\tabcellsep 4.661\tabcellsep 4.690\tabcellsep 1.165\tabcellsep 27.33\\ (tb)\tabcellsep 38.692\tabcellsep 51449\tabcellsep 0.43\tabcellsep 50890\tabcellsep 4.583\tabcellsep 7.157\tabcellsep 1.151\tabcellsep 90.71\\ (lb)\tabcellsep 38.138\tabcellsep 46681\tabcellsep 0.424\tabcellsep 51323\tabcellsep 4.553\tabcellsep 7.218\tabcellsep 1.138\tabcellsep 92.81\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 . 9 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.21448598130841118\textwidth}P{0.023831775700934577\textwidth}P{0.023831775700934577\textwidth}P{0.02978971962616822\textwidth}P{0.013901869158878503\textwidth}P{0.1608644859813084\textwidth}P{0.18271028037383177\textwidth}P{0.2005841121495327\textwidth}} \multicolumn{4}{l}{Specimen E (kN/m²) M stiff (kg) F u (kN)}\tabcellsep V u\tabcellsep Tonnage of ship (ton)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{E T (mJ) E load (mJ)}\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1000\tabcellsep 14.08\tabcellsep 211.43\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2000\tabcellsep 28.16\tabcellsep 422.86\\ Flat bar\tabcellsep 2.07\tabcellsep 0.38\tabcellsep 19.09\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3000\tabcellsep 42.24\tabcellsep 634.28\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4000\tabcellsep 56.32\tabcellsep 845.71\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5000\tabcellsep 70.4\tabcellsep 1057.14\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1000\tabcellsep 14.08\tabcellsep 1987.18\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2000\tabcellsep 28.16\tabcellsep 3974.36\\ T-bar\tabcellsep 3.81\tabcellsep 0.72\tabcellsep 51.44\tabcellsep 0.16\tabcellsep 3000\tabcellsep 42.24\tabcellsep 5961.54\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4000\tabcellsep 56.32\tabcellsep 7948.72\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5000\tabcellsep 70.4\tabcellsep 9935.90\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1000\tabcellsep 14.08\tabcellsep 1627.92\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2000\tabcellsep 28.16\tabcellsep 3255.85\\ Angle bar\tabcellsep 3.87\tabcellsep 0.64\tabcellsep 46.68\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3000\tabcellsep 42.24\tabcellsep 4883.77\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4000\tabcellsep 56.32\tabcellsep 6511.69\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5000\tabcellsep 70.4\tabcellsep 8139.61\\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{IV. Conclusion and Recommendation}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ a) Conclusion\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4 .}\end{figure} \backmatter \subsection[{Acknowledge}]{Acknowledge}\par I would like to thank Faculty of Maritime Studies and Marine Science (FMSM), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu for their assistance extended to facilitate the journey of this Final Year Academic Projects. The most appreciation is intended for Mr. Ir. Oladokun Sulaiman as supervisors who provide guidance and assistance throughout this project. At same, thanks for \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Khedmati and Ghavami ()]{b5}\label{b5} ‘A numerical assessment of the buckling/ultimate strength characteristics of stiffened aluminium plates with fixed/floating transverse frames’. M R Khedmati , K Ghavami . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2009. 47 p. . \bibitem[Rønning et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘An experimental study of ultimate compressive strength of transversely stiffened aluminium panels’. L Rønning , A Aalberg , P K Larsen . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2010. 48 p. . \bibitem[Sekulski ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘Least-weight topology and size optimization of high speed vehicle-passenger catamaran structure by genetic algorithm’. . Z Sekulski . \textit{Marine Structures} 2009. 22 p. . \bibitem[Paik and Seo ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Non linear finite element method models for ultimate strength analysis of steel stiffened-plate structures under combined biaxial compression and lateral pressure actions -PartI : Plate elements’. J K Paik , J K Seo . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2009. 47 p. . \bibitem[Wang et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Probability of the presence of damage estimated from an active sensor network in a composite panel of multiple stiffeners’. D Wang , L Ye , Y Lu , Z Su . \textit{Composites Science and Technology} 2009. 69 p. . \bibitem[Brubak and Hellesland ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘Semi-analytical post buckling and strength analysis of arbitrarily stiffened plates in local and global bending’. L Brubak , J Hellesland . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2007. 45 p. . \bibitem[Khedmati et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Sensitivity analysis on the elastic buckling and ultimate strength of continuous stiffened aluminium plates under combined in-plane compression and lateral pressure’. M R Khedmati , M R Zareei , P Rigo . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2009. 47 p. . \bibitem[Rigoa et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} ‘Sensitivity analysis on ultimate strength of aluminium stiffened panels’. P Rigoa , R Sarghiutab , S Estefenc , E Lehmannd , S C Otelead , I Pasqualinoc , B C Simonsene , Z Wanf , T Yaog . \textit{Marine Structures} 2003. 16 p. . \bibitem[Ye and Moan ()]{b3}\label{b3} ‘Static and fatigue analysis of three types of aluminium box-stiffener/web frame connections’. N Ye , T Moan . \textit{International Journal of Fatigue} 2007. 29 p. . \bibitem[Brubak and Hellesland ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘Strength criteria in semi-analytical, large deflection analysis of stiffened plates in local and global bending’. L Brubak , J Hellesland . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2008. 46 p. . \bibitem[Bonorchis and Nurick ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘The analysis and simulation of welded stiffener plates subjected to localized blast loading’. D Bonorchis , G N Nurick . \textit{International Journal of Impact Engineering} 2010. 37 p. . \bibitem[Zha and Moan ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Ultimate strength of stiffened aluminium panels with predominantly torsional failure modes’. Y Zha , T Moan . \textit{Thin-Walled Structures} 2001. 39 p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}