# Introduction onstruction projects development depend on effective documentation for success because they require complex interactions of multiple stakeholders and participants. Effective documentation of projects requires synthesis and integration of contributions from all parties involved in ownership, use, design, estimation, construction, operation, management, oversight and maintenance, who must work together in structured, organized and collaborative manner in the project documentation chain (Ajator, 2012(Ajator, , 2012a;;Ajator etal,2011) to ensure success. The conceptual questions in effective documentation for successful contract administration and management include among others: ? What level of quality is exercised in structuring project briefs/ requirements by the client, his agent and user? The objective of this research is thus to attempt to expose some of the key techniques and knowhow of these imperative documentation paradigms in contract management. II. # Literature Review Most projects require the use of basic contract documents. These include (IBRD,1999,Langdon, 2007); articles of agreement, conditions of contract with all necessary deletions/ amendments if standard form is used, drawing/or specifications of work to be done. Cost estimates/ priced bills of quantities including post-tender negotiation documentation, and contract programme/ progress charts. Other basic documentations required in projects include pre-tender documentations, early warning charts, quality performance charts, minutes of site meetings, project instructions, valuations/ certifications, cash flow and earned value management among others. Ajator (2012) recorded the importance index of some project documentation variables (see Table 2.1) in which professionals ascribed high percentage ratings of 32,26,26 and 23 to BOQ preparation, project design, construction plan and change orders (variation) documentations respectively. When these variables are efficiently documented, they provide relevant databases for resolution of disputes at project delivery. Other researches (Ajator, 2007(Ajator, , 2000a(Ajator, , 2000b;;Project Documentation Certification Taskforce,1997;Galo, etal 2002;Tilly, etal 2000Tilly, etal , 2002;;Love etal, 2000Love etal, ,1996) ) have identified declining quality of these documentations and disregard of due processes and inefficiencies which have resulted in increased project cost, time, risk, delay and disputes. Tilley, et al (2002), Gallo, etal (2002) and Ajator (2012) specifically identified issues associated with documentation failings and its manifestations, some of which are consequential on others and some involving more than one stakeholders. Accuracy of estimate must base on bottom-up approach/WBS and activity cost coding/cost accounts. Relevant executory personnel must be used to analyze cost at the lowest possible work units or finest detail with minimal provisional items and estimator bias. Ineffective estimate documentation result from inadequate cost data bases, poor understanding and experience of the terrain, the technologies, various currencies/conversion rates, the duties, Ports' charges, transport systems (both local and international) available and costs of finance and funding system. Apart from possible inaccuracy of analyzed benchmark cost and factoring errors, there is often problem of improper planning and non-inclusion of all work items for which cost/prices must be allocated (Ajator,1989,1999, Aliyu, 2006). # Client-Related Causes of Documentation In high "import-factor" infrastructure projects, other important cost consideration must include cost of shipping, stacking in the factory (demurrage charges, by manufacturers), marine insurance, clearing costs at ports, duties, insurance, warehousing, local transportation etc. These real costs where not documented can cause disputes and project failure. # c) Tender/Other Documentation Failings Tendering procedures involving multiple notices to tenderers and question/answer steps erode document accuracy due to short time available for amendments. Bidders withhold important questions that may reveal their competitive edge especially in complicated warped award processes and short tender times. # d) Contractor-Related Documentation Issues Contractors strive to redistribute risk to other sake holders, engage low cost and low skilled subcontractor, choose to withhold useful tender information (RFIS). Make spurious unsubstantiated claims' submissions to recover losses arising from initial low bids, inflate invoices, insurance and bond claims to cover perceived risks and difficulties in maintaining skill levels. The general causes impeding effective documentation involving all parties include; inadequate time for project planning, relevant parties not involved in project planning (eg project monitoring consultants) early enough, especially at concept and decision times; slow responses by most clients and their agents to questions/ queries from bidders at tender, and contractors at construction stage, worsen rather than improve documentation quality, and adversarial attitude embedded in the procurement culture. # e) Relevance of Effective Documentation in Procurement The vehicle for achieving national development is efficient procurement. But this must obtain through monitoring which inturn depends on Effective Documentation. Procurement is viewed by Ajator and Agusiobu (2007) and Eze (2009) as the acquisition of goods, works and/or services at the best possible total cost of ownership, in the right quantity and quality at the right time, in the right place for the direct benefit or use of Government, corporation/organization or individuals. The key to the achievement of effective procurement is monitoring and evaluation. To monitor, there must be well documented plan of activities, standards and cost baselines against which the actual is compared or benchmarked. Hence to monitor is to keep under observation and check for possible deviations from plans, standards and cost levels. So effective documentation which provides these plans, standards and baselines; becomes of paramount importance. The importance of documentation can be seen from project procurement monitoring steps which include among others checking the: # f) Documentation for Project Preparation/Formulation This must cover the key problems/needs of the project, expected benefits, alternatives/options, alignment of the projects with Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) Sectoral projects' preferences, competitiveness of project costs, their feasibility, financial/economic analysis, environmental impact, and detailed project designs, future operation/ maintenance requirements, implementation plans and proper packaging (Ajator,2012a). Efficient documentation of these subjects provides clear guidelines, standards and cost targets to facilitate examining their adequacy to achieve national goal and objectives. The content of these documents constitute approved guidelines/ standards for monitoring the activities and projects at execution stage. Failure of documentation at this stage renders abortive monitoring and evaluation at execution stage. # g) Documentation for Project Procurement For Project procurement, documentation must encompass; preparation of tender documents/ requirements; contract drawings, contract conditions and bills etc. notification/advertising methods and medium. Pre-qualification exercise, setting appropriate bid time, special bid process (if any) in line with FGN's procurement guidelines which harps on open competitive and transparent bid process, bid evaluation/ tender report and award template. Appropriate tender board size and structure. Objective negotiation and approval of selection criteria. Mobilization, Surety or bonds requirements. And compliance assessment template. All in line with FGN extant procurement guidelines. These documentations will facilitate checking or monitoring transparency of procurement process as necessary building block for cost-effective project implementation. # h) Documentation at Project Implementation Here the appropriated funds for the project(s) and planned tranche releases from contract conditions are documented. Periods of site visits by project consultants/supervisors, residency plans, prescriptive specifications and performance specifications and agencies'/ statutory organizations' obligations to the contract as documented in the contract conditions are highlighted. Project Evaluation and Control documents widely dominate the documentation at project implementation stage (Ajator & Onyechi, 2011). They encompass documentation of interim valuations, paid and unpaid certificates, valuation of variations, claims, fluctuations, records of unanticipated site/ work conditions, day works, projects' instructions confirmed and unconfirmed, weather conditions, records of notices, wavers, omissions, accidents, minutes of site meetings, catastrophic event, riot, war etc. They equally include project goal, plan, cost estimate, network schedule, budget, control and management objectives, implementation programmes (PPC), Cash flow documentations and earned value analysis and management. Evaluation and Control documents seek to facilitate regular monitoring of project achievement by comparing actual performance and progress against planned performance and progress. So that when deviations from planned progress occur, corrective actions/ re-plan are implemented. The intent of this documentation (especially earned value management) is for early discovery of current/future departure from planned course, so that adjustments can be made in good time. Essentials of Effective Evaluation/ Control System (Austen & Neal, 1984, Ajator, etal 2015). # Imperatives of Effective Documentation Evident from the foregoing is that: ? Success of physical and social infrastructure development contract must obtain through control. ? But control cannot be achieved without project monitoring. ? And monitoring must be achieved through proper project documentation including components cost definitions, programming and budgeting. ? For efficient and effective project documentation to emerge, Project partnering spirit (openness) must be exhibited by all project participants/ stakeholders (Ajator, etal 2008). ? Re-examine all pre-contract letters, and carefully recheck all signed documents concerned prior to the execution of contract. ? Examine all pre-contract photographs of the site and/or adjacent properties and make sure that shown on the contract drawings or agree and correct any errors before the work commences in the case of difference. ? Photograph site on the day of possession, if necessary to reveal fly-tipping, refuse dumping, flooding and any other items over which there may be subsequent argument. ? During progress, constantly compare work being executed with the itemized works in the bills to ascertain conformity in condition and/or character. ? Make certain that all depths to drainages and foundation works have been corroborated before concreting and that all extra digging for isolated soft sports and any excavation below contract datum has been agreed in writing and included in the correct nomenclature of the S.M.M. ? Keep records of materials used for filling soft sports. ? Maintain records of hours spent on pumping out water in foundations. ? Keep records of all "breaking out" of block work, masonry, timber, concrete, reinforced concrete and steel piling etc, making certain that the records were signed and agreed by both parties to the contract. ? Remeasure all provisional quantities and obtain all signed records necessary for evidence and agreement. ? Maintain records of original and revised drawings to prove facts concerning any later items of possible disputes. ? Make all notifications for claiming star rates and star items in accordance with clause 11(4), on time. ? Similarly for claims under clause(s) 1(2), 11 (6) This underlines the need for early appointment of monitoring consultants. The information to be elicited using these standard forms include project title, contractor, contract period, elapsed time, target time, target output, performance indices; index of work done, value of work done, payment to date, cash flow index, input of beneficiary, problems and suggested solutions, performance of project participants (project consultants, in-house professionals, manufacturers, suppliers and contractors). These documentations by monitoring consultants to be effective, require formalizing of relationship with all project participants in order to ensure objective data collection. # e) Documentation of Action Plans, Milestones and Construction Programme Monitoring consultants' documentation shall break down the project tasks into stages and milestones to facilitate monitoring (see Appendix A3 and Appendix B). These will enable the evaluation of progress and financial position periodically for effective audit report. Adhering to documented dates of site visit enables the project monitors to accredit or refute the reports of project consultants regarding size of time and cost variances of projects. This facilitates effective documentation of breach of work ethics and its transmission to the client and possibly to statutory authorities. Documentation for monitoring is synonymous with generation of standardized data collection format, to facilitate assessment of performance of each project/participant at pre-determined stages in relation to time performance, cost performance, cash flow levels, and quality performance as illustrated in appendix B, tables 1-13. This will ensure financial discipline, avoid/reduce delays, cost overruns and project abandonment, increase output of construction industry and add value to the national economy. # IV. Conclusion And Recommendation The study concludes that for documentation to be effective in realizing project success, it must span administration documentation and monitoring/evaluation documentation. It posits that success of physical and social infrastructure development contracts must obtain through control and that control cannot be achieved without project monitoring which in itself relies on effective documentations to add value to the economy. Project monitors shall work in collaboration with other project consultants, in-house project co-ordinators or desk officers, the contractor, the project co-ordinating taskforce members, other specialist consultants, funding and donor officials by assigning clearly defined duties and assessing their capabilities and outputs from time to time. 21Weighed RatingDocumentation Quality Variable (DQVS)No. of RespScore %Imp IndexWSWXS1 Project Brief/ Requirements Documentation3270222 Project Design3380263 Cost Engineering/BOQ Preparation3689324 Construction Plan Documentation3575265 Implementation Sequence Documentation3360206 Budgeting/Cashflow Documentation3165207 Earned Value Management Documentation2561158 Labour/Plant/Equipment Statements3360209 Control/ Report System Documentation25561410 Project Inspections/Site Meetings/ Minutes Documentation26581511 Valuation/Certificates Documentation30621912 Change Orders (variations)/ Other Instructions Documentation29782313 Price Fluctuation Documentation26501314 Day Works Claims Documentation1850915 Accidents/Force Majure/Weather Change/Dispute Documentation16457Source: Effective project documentation must therefore providerequirements that cover four main phases:? Documentation for Project Preparation/Formulation(Pre-tender documentation)? Documentation for Project Procurement (Tenderdocumentation)? Documentation at Project Implementation (ContractAdmin documentation)? Documentation for Contract Oversight/Audit(Monitoring/Evaluation documentation). indicate what can be done to avoid/alleviate thedelay. Notify subcontractors etc.b) The Quantity SurveyorThe Quantity Surveyor should ensure:? That only drawings on which the tender is basedform part of the contract with endorsementscertifying them as drawings on which the bills ofquantities are based.? Similar check should be extended on all othercontract documents e.g. articles of agreement isfully filled as well as the appendix and preliminaries.? Ensure that deletions/omission/ alternations to thestandard condition are minimized and allamendments fully signed by both parties.? Avoid over or under measurement of billed worksand at all times comply strictly with the rules of theS.M.M.? That bills of quantities reflect all agreedamendments to rates with any agreed percentageadjustment endorsed by the parties before awitness(es).? That prescribed copies of the contract documentsare issued to the contractor.? During post award management, maintaincomprehensive records that will facilitate smooth,speedy interim valuation, valuation of variations,claims, fluctuations and preparation of finalaccounts.c) The Architect? The Architect should maintain a log of what is going, 12, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34 and for arbitration 35 etc. ? Make weekly or daily returns of all labour, sub-contractors, specialist plants and materials involved for cost records or day works.on, what is present on site and the apparent effect of any unusual occurrences and delays etc. ? Obtain better understanding of manufacturers' dimensions, current range of components, fixing details and the site problems of tolerances, handling and fixing. ? Become more aware of site practices, construction? Keep records of all Architect certificates, instructionssequencing, continuity problems and the influenceand variations and prompt for variation orders whenof the site environment on design and cost.the need arises.? Effect closer consultation with site management and? Obtain authority for day works and similarly overtimeoperatives involved in construction.works.? Provide explanatory notes, component details and? Confirm all Architect's oral instructions in writingpromptly issue instructions as and when the need? Attend site meetings, maintain and read records ofarises.resolutions and other correspondences arising? Make use of feedback information and avoid overduring work progress.optimistic and spuriously short programmes? Back all claims with appropriate claim clauses andsensitive to time and cost over runs.maintain up-to-date price fluctuation records. ? Claim against nominated subcontractors/suppliersd) Documentation for Contract Oversight/ Auditfor loss/expense caused through their delay andother contra-charges.? Give notices providing details as soon as actual orlikely delay to progress is reasonably apparent, 5S/NDATEORDER NO. DESCRIPTIONAMOUNT CLAIMEDAGREED COSTREMARKS123456Cumulative to date 6S/NDATELABOUR OR MATERIALSDESCRIPTIONAMOUNT CLAIMEDAGREED COSTREMARKS123456Cumulative to date 7S/NDESCRIPTION OF INTERESTREMARKS123 8S/NNATURE OF PROBLEMSSOLUTIONS DEVISEDREMARKS123 9PERFORMANCEE INDICATORCONTRACTORSSUB ORS CONTRACT-MANUFACTURERS SUPPLIERS PC CLIENTAdherence to timeQuality of workCompliance withdeliveriesQuality of staff(Qualification)Adequacy of staff (No)Co-operation withother participants The Imperatives of Effective Documentation in Contract Administration and Management in Nigeria References Références Referencias© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) Source: Authors' Proposal/ Report (Ajator, etal 2007) * Documentation Quality Appraisal in Private and Public Projects in Nigeria UOAjator Journal of Applied Sciences and Development (JASD). An International Academic Research Journal 4121-8241 3 2012. October * Development Projects Appraisal, Practical Feasibility Viability Studies (FVS) Guide UAjator 2012a * The imperatives of Effective Monitoring and Evaluation of Capital Projects UOAjator AOnyechi Tropical Built Environment Journal (TBEJ) 1 2 2011. Sept, 2011 * Green Construction and Nigeria Policy Thrust-A Statistical Review UOAjator Environmental Review 3 1 2000a * Projects Impacts and Mitigation -A challenge For Nigeria Construction Practitioners in the Third Millennium UOAjator Environmental Review 2 2000b * UAjator Communiqué" of the 3-Day National Conference/Training Workshop on Building Construction and Built Environment/ Millennium Development Goals-The Journey so far 2007 * Sept. ESUT, Auditorium complex * Expression of Interest For Consultants and Technical Specialists' Appointments; Proposal submitted to the Federal Government of Nigeria For Appointment into National Project Monitoring Consultancy Scheme UAjator OAgusiobu OD 2007 * Partnering: A veritable toolFor Successful Implementation of the National Building code in Nigeria UAjator SOO & On Yeador Journal of the Association of Architectural 2008 The AARCHES-J. * Application of Cost Accounting Techniques in Capital Project Delivery in Nigeria, Unpublished MSc Project UOAjator 1989 Department of Finance/Banking, ASUTECH Enugu Nigeria * Solar Energy: an Emerging Option for Private/public Generation of Electricity UOAjator 1999 22 Owerri Nigeria February Imo State University paper presented in CEENACON 99 Conference * Controlling The Mythical Features of Construction Profit UOAjator COOk Oye PCAgbonome International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences Paradigms 21 10 2015 * Managing Construction Projects: A Guide to Processes and Procedures; International Labour Organization Geneva ADAusten RH&neale 1984 * Public Procurement and Contract Management, Presented paper at the 2day National Seminar, Organized by the Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors NIQS, Ondo State Chapter NAkande 2010 8 th December at Babafunke Ajasen Multi-Purpose Hall Akure * Quantity Surveying in the 21 st Century: Agenda for the future EAliyu Paper Presented at the NIQS Biennal Conference 20 th -25 th November. Channel View Hotel and Conference Centre Calabar, Nigeria 2006 * Public Procurement Act EMEze on Public Procurement Act Advocacy, 17 th September at Hotel Presidential Enugu Nigeria 2009 Paper presented to the MDAS, the South East Zone * Project Documentation and its impact on Efficiency in the Building and Construction Industry, Available online as PDF file. 17. International Bank for Reconstruction & Development (IBRD) World Bank (1999) Guidelines for procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits GGallo GLucas AMclennan TParminter PTilley 2002. 20433 World Bank Publication Washington D.C. * The Aqua Group Guide to procurement, Tendering and Contract Administration DLangdon Mark Hacket, Lan Robinson & Gary Stathan 2007 Black Well Publishing UK * Quantifying the Causes and Costs of Rework in Construction PE DLove HLi Construction Management/ Economics 18 2000 * PE DLove SMohamed SNTurker Construction Process Reengineering and the Australian Construction Industry, Australian Institute of Building (AIB) Papers 1996 9 * Computing Building Cost Indices for Nigeria AIOnyechi The Quantity Surveyor Lagos 1991. July 12 * Project Documentation Certification Taskforce 1997 Project Documentation Quality Report * Submitted to the Petroleum Special Trust Fund (PTF) Abuja, Nigeria * Design and Documentation Quality Survey: Comparison of Designers' and Contractors' Perspectives PATilley SIMcfallan Melbourne: CSIRO-Building Construction and Engineering BEC 2000. Dec,00/115 * Improving Design and Documentation Quality PTilley SLMcfallan RGSinclair 2002 * Joint Conference, Hongkong 6 th -8 th May Proceeding of the CIBW * Educators in Nigeria 7 2 April/September * *Ua* Unacceptable O SA-Satisfactory:3; VS-Very Satisfactory 4 2