# INTRODUCTION through the parasitic capacitor between the primary and secondary coils [12]. To improve the topology of network, the network was designed with one radio frequency transformer with 2:1 by Mardiguian [13]. Moreover, the 0° and 180° power dividers have been used to constitute the noise separation network [14]. Based on the above models and mechanism, a lot of categories have been carried out to reduce the CE noises [15][16][17][18][19]. The EMI noises from DC-DC Buck conversion has been suppressed by employed MOSFET, decoupling capacitors and optimal design for PCB [15]. A frequency modulated (FM) source of conducted emission has an adverse effect on a DC power system and spread spectrum modulation is proposed to reduce EMI noises [16]. The Power Integrity problem for high speed systems is discussed in context of selection and placement of decoupling capacitors. The optimal capacitors and their locations on the board are found using the presented methodology, which can be used for similar power delivery networks in high speed systems [17]. A modified LLCL-filter topology is proposed to provide enough attenuation on the conducted EMI noise as well as to reduce the DC side leakage current [18]. A new method to reduce CM EMI at the DC input of variable-speed motor drives is analyzed. Unlike conventional passive or active filtering techniques that rely on impedance mismatch or active noise cancellation, the method uses a passive circuit with matched impedance to cancel the inverter CM current [19]. However, the above noise reduction methods can't obtain the EMI source and solve the EMI problem fundamentally in the economy and practical scale. In view of above analysis and on basis of the acquired achievements about EMC of electronic equipments, the CE models and mechanisms for SMPS have been analyzed in the paper. And the CE measurement uncertainty was studies based on the voltage division factor, isolation factor and impedance under SMPS side of artificial mains network. Then, three methods have been proposed to reduce the CE, such as the capacitor shunt between the source and drain electrodes of MOSFET, CM choke and crosstalk choke, and the capacitors matrix. The experiment results show that the CE noises of the power concentrator and colonoscopy can be suppressed effectively and efficiently by using the present approaches, while can pass the EN 55022 and improve the safety and EMI performance. # Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volume XVII Issue II Version I Li Lin ? , Qiu Dongmei ? , Yan Wei ? & Gao Xiang ? witch mode power supply (SMPS) has been widely applied in the electrical and electronics devices, which can realize the AC-DC, DC-DC conversion and generate larger amount of electromagnetic interference (EMI), especially conducted emission (CE) from 9kHz and 30MHz [1][2][3][4][5]. The CE standards have been established by the most countries and areas, such as EN 55022 [6]. In recent years, the CE models and mechanisms for live, neutral and ground lines system have been proposed to analyze the noises paths, which contributes to noise suppression [7][8][9][10][11]. The CE models consist of common mode (CM) and differential mode (DM) noises. The CM noise path is from live/neutral line to ground line, and the DM path is from live line to neutral line. Four kinds of noise separation networks have been proposed to determine the CE mechanism by extracting CM and DM noises by Paul, See, Mardiguian and Guo [2,[12][13][14]. Paul network is composed of two radio frequency transformers with 1:1 and artificial switch, through which the high frequency (HF) noises are generated and coupled [2]. The core of See network is also two radio frequency transformers with 2:1, but the HF noises are generated # II. SMPS OPERATION DESCRIPTION SMPS can support direct current (DC) power to the load through four diodes and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET). Voltage dependent resistance (VDR) was employed to resist and suppress the external surges and interferences. Three capacitors and common mode (CM) choke were used to reduce the high frequency (HF) EMI noises. However, a large amount of EMI noises were generated by SMPS via four diodes and FET, which will go to power supply through power line and influence other electrical and electronics devices. CM and differential mode (DM) models were established to analyze the noise mechanism and suppress the above EMI noises based on three line system including live, neutral and ground lines, as shown in Fig. 1. Power Supply SMPS L N G DM Noise # CM Noise Fig. 1: CM and DM noise mechanism based on three line system Due to the difference between the topology of SMPS (two line system without ground line) and traditional three line system, the conducted emission mechanism will be studied. # III. # UNCERTAINTY OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT According to EN 55022 and FCC Part 15, conducted emission can be detected by EMI receiver and artificial mains network (AMN), where quasi peak detector and average detector should be fixed on the EMI receiver. To analyze the uncertainty of CE measurement, the topology structure and HF parasitic parameters of AMN will be investigated. According to CISPR 16, the topology structure is shown in Fig. 2, where C 1 is 1?F, C 2 is 0.1?F, R 1 is 50?, R 2 is 1k? and L 1 is 50?H. The HF noise from 9kHz to 30MHz in power supply can be reduced by capacitor C 1 and inductance L 1 , and the 50Hz current is also ordinary and functional. The CE from 9kHz to 30MHz in SMPS can be extracted through capacitor C 2 . Resistance R 1 is used to bypass flow and resistance R 2 is designed to measure CE. Considering the HF parasitic parameters of the above capacitors, inductances and resistances, as shown in Fig. 2, L esc1 and L esc2 are the parasitic inductance of C 1 and C 2 , respectively. C esl1 is the parasitic capacitor of L 1 . L es and R es are the parasitic inductance and resistance of the interface adapter. In the paper, R es is neglected due to the adapter design and manufacturing technique. To analyze the characteristic of AMN, the voltage division factor, isolation factor and impedance under SMPS side were defined as 20 log 20 log 20 log 20 log N L L N LG NG N L L N PLG PNG U U VIF VIF U U U U IRR IRR U U = = = =( # F Where, VIF L and VIF N denote the live and neutral lines voltage division factor of AMN, IRR L and IRR N represent the live and neutral lines isolation factor of AMN, U L and U N express the total CE of live and neutral lines, U LG and U NG express the HF EMI noise between live/ neutral and ground lines. # a) The voltage division factor of AMN To analyze the voltage division factor of AMN, the above parasitic parameters were considered lonely as shown in Tab.1 and the results were shown in Fig. 3. # b) The isolation factor of AMN To analyze the isolation factor of AMN, the above parasitic parameters were considered lonely as shown in Tab.I and the results were shown in Fig. 4, where the L es can be neglected due to the measurement circuit. # c) The impedance under SMPS side of AMN To determine the impedance under SMPS side of AMN, L es was considered as 10nH and 100nH, respectively, and the other parasitic parameters can be neglected due to the measurement circuit, as shown inFig.5. As shown in Fig. 5, with the L es and measurement frequency increasing, the impedance under SMPS side was increasing greatly. Therefore, the proper AMN should be designed and employed to determine the CE and decrease the uncertainty of CE measurement through capacitor and inductance matching. IV. # CE CHARACTERISTIC MECHANISM MODEL a) CM and DM models Due to the difference between the two line SMPS system and three line system, the CE characteristic mechanism model should be established. Considered that SMPS have live and neutral lines but no ground line, the CM and DM noise transmission loop can't be formed and realized. As shown in Fig. 2, the two different results can be obtained based on EN 55022, as follows: = L N L N I I I I ? Where, I L and I N denote the total CE current through live and neutral lines. Based on the formula (2), the unbalanced noise current can be defined as Where, I CM signifies the balanced noise current and can be considered as CM noise current. Based on Fig. 2, the total live line noise have two bypass loops, such as live to ground noise I LG and live to neutral noise I LN . Similarly, the total neutral line noise also have two bypass loops, such as neutral to ground noise I NG and neutral to live noise I NL . Supposed that Based on the formula (3) and ( 9), the CM noise can be defined as 2 L N CM LG NG CM U U U U U U + = = =(10) The equivalent transmission circuit of CM noise was shown in Fig. 6(a). Where, U CM and Z CM represent the equivalent CM noise source and its impedance. Based on the formula (3) and ( 8), the DM noise can be defined as 2 2 L N L N DM DM I I U U I U ? ? = =(11) The equivalent transmission circuit of DM noise was shown in Fig. 6(b). Where, U DM and Z DM represent the equivalent DM noise source and its impedance. Moreover, Z CM and Z DM can be determined by employing the insertion method, dual current probe method, single current probe current, scattering parameter method and the proposed dual resistance calibration method. Due to the two lines system, the parasitic capacitor to ground can be considered to analyze the equivalent bypass circuits of CM and DM noises, as shown in Fig. 7. The DM noise path was from live line to neutral line, the same as the three line system, as shown in Fig. 1. However, the CM noise path was from live/neutral line to ground line, then to the SMPS through the parasitic capacitor C PG . Therefore, CE for SMPS still have CM and DM noises, but not the only DM noise, where noise suppression categories should be designed not only for DM noise but also for CM noise. Moreover, the DM noise is much larger than CM noise in general because the parasitic capacitor is little, even ignored. # CE MITIGATION METHOD FOR SMPS a) The capacitor shunt between the source and drain electrodes of MOSFET The switch frequency can be controlled through the grid electrode of MOSFET and the HF noise will generate and couple to the source and drain electrodes due to the MOSFET. The frequency of noises are based on the switch velocity, basically from 9kHz to 30MHz, which is the CE source. The capacitor shunt between the source and drain electrodes can be used to reduce the above HF noises. Moreover, the value of the capacitor should be smaller than 0.1?F not only for the noise mitigation but also for the safety regulations & design, as shown in Fig. 8, where, C 4 denotes the capacitor shunt between the source and drain electrodes of MOSFET. # Global # b) CM choke and crosstalk choke The CM choke can be employed to suppress the CM noises, but can't solve the environmental electromagnetic field coupling. As shown in Fig. 9(a), the live and neutral lines are in the same direction in the CM choke, which can well reduce the CM noise due to the electromagnetic field offset. Meanwhile, the CM choke can be considered as two electric dipoles which can receive the environmental electromagnetic field greatly and couple to the power lines. And the amplitude of the coupling noise is based on the length of dipoles and the noise frequency. The crosstalk choke whose live and neutral lines are in the different orientation, can be used to solve the above problem. With different of CM choke, the crosstalk choke can be considered as the magnetic dipole, which can also obtain the environmental electromagnetic field. And the magnitude of the coupling noise resolves the area of dipole and the noise frequency. As shown in Fig. 9(b), the area of the dipole is the area between the live and neutral lines, which is very little. As shown in Fig. 12, the L C1 represents the CM choke and crosstalk choke. The single capacitor with the fixed value can suppress the certain spectrum noise due to HF parasitic parameter of the capacitor, such as the parasitic inductance of the pins. The capacitors matrix can be employed to solve the problem, which consists of 100pF, 1nF, 10nF, 0.01?F and 0.1?F. The different frequency noise will be reduced by the capacitors with different values, as shown in Tab.2. As shown in Fig. 8, the C M1 and C M2 denote the two capacitors matrix. # EXPERIMENT VERIFICATION To verify the proposed methods, the SMPSs of the power concentrator and colonoscopy are studied in the paper. In the experiment, R&S EMI receiver ESL3 and R&S artificial mains network (AMN) ENV216 are used to determine the CE generated by the above devices. # a) SMPS of the power concentrator The original CE result of the power concentrator is shown in Fig. 10(a),(b). According to EN 55022 Class B, the noise can't pass the standard from 150kHz to 10MHz. The average noises are 54dB?V@13.56MHz and 55dB?V@27.12MHz. And it exceeds 20dB?V from 3MHz to 5MHz, even critical. Based on the proposed method, the mitigation approaches are designed as follows: 1. EMI filter for SMPS of the power concentrator is designed, as shown in Fig. 10(c), where L 1 denotes 10mH CM choke, both L 2 and L 3 represent 1mH inductance, C 1 , C 2 and C 3 signify 0.01?F, 10nF and 1nF, respectively. 2. 10nF capacitor is shunt between the power supply of the carrier module to HF noises. Due to the above methods, the CE of the power concentrator can pass EN 55022 Class B, where the average noises are 35dB?V@13.56MHz and 41dB?V@27.12MHz. And the safety margin of the power concentrator can reach 10dB?V, as shown in Fig. 10(d). The experiment results show that the CE noises of the power concentrator and colonoscopy can be reduced very well by employing the present approaches. # VIII. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volume XVII Issue II Version I 2![Fig. 2: Topology structure of AMN based on CISPR 16 (red characters are HF parasitic parameters)](image-2.png "Fig. 2 :") 3![Fig. 3: The voltage division factor of AMN considering HF parasitic parametersAs shown in Fig.3, L esc2 and L es have great influence on the voltage division factor of AMN.](image-3.png "Fig. 3 :") 4![Fig.4: The isolation factor of AMN considering HF parasitic parameters As shown in Fig.4, C esl1 have great influence on the isolation factor of AMN.](image-4.png "Fig. 4 :") 5![Fig.5: The impedance under SMPS side of AMN considering HF parasitic parameters](image-5.png "Fig. 5 :") ![DM represents the unbalanced noise current and can be considered as DM noise current. Then,](image-6.png "") 6![Fig. 6: Noise equivalent transmission circuits b) CE model for SMPSDue to the two lines system, the parasitic capacitor to ground can be considered to analyze the equivalent bypass circuits of CM and DM noises, as shown in Fig.7.The DM noise path was from live line to neutral line, the same as the three line system, as shown in Fig.1. However, the CM noise path was from live/neutral line to ground line, then to the SMPS through the parasitic capacitor C PG .Therefore, CE for SMPS still have CM and DM noises, but not the only DM noise, where noise suppression categories should be designed not only for DM noise but also for CM noise.Moreover, the DM noise is much larger than CM noise in general because the parasitic capacitor is little, even ignored.](image-7.png "Fig. 6 :") .1: Four Parasitic Parameters AssumptionL esc11 nHL esc20.1 nHC esl140 pFL es100 nH Year 201731of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volume XVII Issue II Version I FGlobal JournalCapacitor's ValueReduced noises frequency100pF20MHz and the above1nF10MHz-30MHz10nF5MHz-20MHz0.01?F500kHz-10MHz0.1?F9kHz-1MHz© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) Year 2017 F © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) Modeling and Mitigation on Conducted Emission for Switch Mode Power Supply© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) ## ACKNOWLEDGMENT This paper is supported by Project Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51475246); National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20161019); University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (15KJB470011). * ClaytonRPaul Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility Hoboken, U.S.A John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2006 Second Edition * WHenry Ott Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineering 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc * EMC of power converters: The self-compatibility approach CAttaianese VNardi GTomasso IET Electric Power Applications 1 6 2007 * Radiated emission mechanism for semi-active control strategy of magneto-rheological damper WeiYan QiangTang EnrongWang International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 51 2 2016 * Analysis and mitigation on conducted electromagnetic interference of semi-active control strategy for magneto-rheological damper WeiYan JingYu QiangTang International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 50 2 2016 * Information technology equipment-Radio disturbance characteristics-Limits and methods of measurement EN 55022-2010 European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization 2010 : The European Commission and the European Free Trade Association * EMI filter for the SMPS of the colonoscopy (d). The final CE result based on the proposed method capacitor step-down DC-DC converter for multiple output choices YHChang IET Electric Power Applications 1 6 2007 Complex programmable logic devicebased closed-loop implementation of switched-F (c) * Approximation of Worst Case Crosstalk at High Frequencies, Electromagnetic Compatibility XiaopengDong HaixiaoWeng DGBeetner THHubing IEEE Transactions on 53 1 2011 * Wang Enrong, et a, Investigation and Reduction on Conducted Electromagnetic Interference Noise Mechanism for Complex Power Electronics Systems YanWei ZhaoYang Proceedings of the CSEE the CSEE 2012 32 * Conducted EMI reduction of PWM inverter for AC motor drive systems LH SKim?j CYu?w Lee International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 24 3 2006 * Rapid computation model for accurate evaluation of electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of fabric with hole based on equivalent coefficient XWang?z Liu?z Zhou International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 47 1 2015 * YakSee Kye Network for conducted EMI diagnosis, Electronic Letter 35 17 1999 * An alternative method for characterizing EMI filter MMardiguian IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 1999 2 * Separation of the commonmode and differential-mode conducted EMI noise TingGuo DYChen IEEE Transaction on Power electronics 11 3 1996 * DC-DC Buck Converter EMI Reduction Using PCB Layout Modification, Electromagnetic Compatibility ABhargava DPommerenke KWKam IEEE Transactions on 53 3 2011 * Impact of a Frequency Modulated Pulsewidth Modulation (PWM) Switching Converter on the Input Power System Quality RMukherjee APatra SBanerjee IEEE Transactions on 25 6 2010 Power Electronics * Selection and placement of decoupling capacitors in high speed systems JNTripathi JMukherjee PRApte Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine 2 4 2013 IEEE * A Modified LLCL Filter With the Reduced Conducted EMI Noise, Power Electronics WWu YSun ZLin IEEE Transactions on 29 7 2014 * Conducted Common-Mode EMI Reduction by Impedance Balancing, Power Electronics LeiXing JianSun IEEE Transactions on 27 3 2012