\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={CFRP Retrofitting Schemes for Prestressed Concrete Box Beams for Highway Bridges},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2017-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2017)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2017-01-15}
\title{CFRP Retrofitting Schemes for Prestressed Concrete Box Beams for Highway Bridges}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Herish A.  Hussein}

             \author[2]{Zia  Razzaq}

             \affil[1]{  Old Dominion University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 11 December 2016 Accepted: 1 January 2017 Published: 15 January 2017}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


This paper investigates various retrofitting schemes for a prestressed concrete box beam using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets with the goal of increasing flexural strength. A simply-supported box beam is studied with a constant uniformly distributed load and three gradually increasing concentrated loads proportional to HS20 truck loading of the Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Various retrofitting schemes are considered each with single, double, and triple CFRP sheets, respectively, installed in high compression and tension regions. Cross-sectional nonlinear moment-curvature relations are developed and coupled with a finite-difference solution algorithm to predict load-deflection relations for both retrofitted and non-retrofitted box beams. The study identifies effective CFRP retrofitting schemes that result in a significant increase in the flexural strength of the prestressed concrete box beam.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{CFRP retrofitting, highway bridges, box beam, prestressed}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 \par
etrofitting prestressed concrete beams to increase their strength is an evolving area of structural engineering research. Retrofitting with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips or plates has been used in tensile regions of concrete beams \hyperref[b0]{[1]}\hyperref[b1]{[2]}\hyperref[b2]{[3]}. CFRP retrofitting material is more advantageous than steel since it is non-corrosive, light-weight, easy to ship, available in practically any length, and easy to install \hyperref[b3]{[4]}\hyperref[b4]{[5]}\hyperref[b5]{[6]}. It also exhibits superior fatigue resistance, low thermal expansion, and low relaxation \hyperref[b6]{[7]}\hyperref[b7]{[8]}\hyperref[b8]{[9]}. Using CFRP laminar sheets on various parts of beams with high-strength adhesive epoxy can increase flexural strength and even support any damaged strands without having to demolish the affected areas \hyperref[b9]{[10]}\hyperref[b10]{[11]}\hyperref[b11]{[12]}. Retrofitting tension regions in beams is of benefit not only to increase strength but also off-set weakness of concrete in tension, and protect prestressing strands from corrosion and vehicle impacts. This paper investigates the effectiveness of using CFRP retrofitting of prestressed concrete box beams in high tensile, compressive, and both tensile and compressive regions. Such retrofitting schemes can provide added strength for highway bridge girders.\par
Figure  {\ref 1} shows a simply-supported prestressed concrete box beam used in highway bridges. The beam is subjected to AASHTO-type of loading in addition to the beam self-weight of 0.842 kips/ft. the external loading consists of a uniformly distributed load of 0.64 kips/ft., and concentrated loads 4P, 4P, and P as shown in Figure  {\ref 1}. The AASHTO loading is obtained if P=8 kips, however, in the present study, the value of P is gradually increased up to collapse condition in the presence of constant uniformly distributed loading. The Type BIII-48 box beam section has two rows of 7-wire ASTM Grade 270 ½ in. diameter strands as shown in Figure  {\ref 2}.\par
To demonstrate the effectiveness of CFRP retrofitting, an AASHTO Type BIII-48 box beam cross section \hyperref[b12]{[13]} is adopted in the present study. Figure  {\ref 2a} shows the box beam cross section without retrofitting and is used as a reference beam section to determine the effectiveness of various retrofitting schemes. As shown in this figure, the prestressing is achieved with two rows of strands with 23 strands per row. Figures  {\ref 2b  and 2c} show the box beam section retrofitted with a single 40 x 1/16 in. CFRP sheet, in tension and compression regions, respectively. Figure  {\ref 2d} shows the box beam with single CFRP sheets in both tension and compression regions. Figures  {\ref 2e -2g} show similar retrofitting schemes with double CFRP sheets while Figures  {\ref 2h-2j} show those with triple CFRP sheets.ð??"ð??" ?? = ð??"ð??" ?? ' [2(? ?? /? ? ) ? (? ?? /? ? ) 2 ]\textbf{(1)}\par
The problem addressed in this study is to determine the effectiveness of various retrofitting schemes shown in Figures  {\ref 2b through 2j}  Abstract-This paper investigates various retrofitting schemes for a prestressed concrete box beam using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets with the goal of increasing flexural strength. A simply-supported box beam is studied with a constant uniformly distributed load and three gradually increasing concentrated loads proportional to HS20 truck loading of the Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Various retrofitting schemes are considered each with single, double, and triple CFRP sheets, respectively, installed in high compression and tension regions. Cross-sectional nonlinear moment-curvature relations are developed and coupled with a finite-difference solution algorithm to predict load-deflection relations for both retrofitted and non-retrofitted box beams. The study identifies effective CFRP retrofitting schemes that result in a significant increase in the flexural strength of the prestressed concrete box beam. 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
where ? ?? is the concrete strain, and ? ? is the concrete strain at ultimate compression strength, ð??"ð??" ?? ' . The numerical results presented in this paper are based on a ð??"ð??" ?? ' value of 5.8 ksi and a concrete modulus of elasticity of 4,383 ksi. Each CFRP sheet used for retrofitting has a thickness of 1/16 in. and a width of 40 in. The Young's modulus of CFRP material is 22,000 ksi and it has an ultimate strength of 260 ksi. is achieved by first formulating the nonlinear momentcurvature relations for the ten cross sections shown in Figure  {\ref 2} followed by theoretical prediction of the load P versus maximum vertical deflection of the beam. 
\section[{Figure 1: Prestressed concrete box beam with AASHTO-type loading}]{Figure 1: Prestressed concrete box beam with AASHTO-type loading}\par
All moment-curvature relations presented in this paper are derived using 7-wire strands prestressed to a force F equal to 160 kips. In the analysis presented, the effects of keys and fillets on the moment-curvature relations for the cross sections in Figure  {\ref 2} are considered negligible. This approximation results in only a 0.06\% difference in the cross-sectional areas. Figure  {\ref 3} shows the strain and stress distribution for a simplysupported box beam with CFRP retrofitting at the bottom. In this figure, C c , T ps , and T CFRP are the resultant concrete force, strand force, and CFRP force, respectively. The concrete force is found using:C c = ? ð??"ð??" ?? ?? 0 × dA = C c2 -C c1 (\textbf{2})\par
where:\par
As seen in Figure  {\ref 3c}, the concrete strain, ? ?? , can be expressed in terms of the curvature ? and distance ?? from neutral axis (NA):? ?? = ? × ??\textbf{(3)}\par
Substituting Equations 1 and 3 into Equation 2 results in \hyperref[b13]{[14]}:C c = b 2 × ð??"ð??" ?? ? × ? [ 2 × ? × ?? ? ? ?? 2 0 -( ? × ?? ? ? ) 2 ] dx -b 1 × ð??"ð??" ?? ? × ? [ 2 × ? × ?? ? ? ?? 1 0 -( ?× ?? ? ? ) 2 ] ????\textbf{(4)}\par
which upon integration gives:C c = b 2 × c 2 2 × ð??"ð??" ?? ? × ? ? ? (1 - ? × ?? 2 3 ? ? ) -b 1 × c 1 2 × ð??"ð??" ?? ? × ? ? ? (1 - ? × ?? 1 3 ? ? )\textbf{(5)}\par
In Figure  {\ref 2d}, X represents the distance of C c from the NA, and is found using:X × C c =? ð??"ð??" ?? ?? 2 0 × b 2 × ?? ???? -? ð??"ð??" ?? ?? 1 0 × b 1 × ?? ???? (6)\par
Using Equations 1, 5, and 6 gives:  Moment-curvature relations are developed for seven different loading stages, namely, at zero external moment, zero strain in concrete at the c.g. of the strands, cracking moment, concrete strain reaching 0.001, 0.002, 0.00248, and 0.003 in./in. The linear portion of the moment-curvature relation is developed using elastic stress-strain distribution. The nonlinear portion of the M-? relation is developed by first assuming the top concrete strain and then determining the NA location iteratively until the axial force equilibrium is satisfied. The converged moment and curvature values are then found using the resulting forces and strain distribution. Using this procedure, the M-? curves are developed for the retrofitted cross sections shown in Figures  {\ref 2b-2d}, 2e-2g, and 2h-2j, respectively. These curves are presented in Figures \hyperref[fig_5]{4, 5}, and 6 including the curve for the non-retrofitted section shown in Figure  {\ref 2a}.    ? f = (0.12 × ?? 0.00008 ?? ) × 10 -5 \hyperref[b12]{(13)} ? g = (0.0004M -13.7) × 10 -5 (  {\ref 14})X = c 2 ( 8 ? ? ? 3 ? × ?? 2 12 ? ? ? 4 ? × ?? 2 ) -c 1 ( 8 ? ? ? 3 ? × ?? 1 12 ? ? ? 4 ? × ?? 1 )\textbf{(7)}? h = M 2.935 × 10 -18\textbf{(15)}\par
? i = (0.035 × ?? 0.0001?? ) × 10 -5 (16) ? j = (0.0003M -9.5) × 10 -5 (17)\par
Equations 9 through 17 are obtained using Excel curve-fitting for use in load-deflection analysis based on finite-difference procedure. It is noteworthy that the same moment-curvature given by Equation  {\ref 12}is found to be applicable to both of the box sections in Figures  {\ref 2d and 2e}. Also, in developing Equations 11, 13, and 16, the last point shown on the curves in Figures \hyperref[fig_5]{4,  5}, and 6 for sections 2c, 2f, and 2i, respectively, are excluded. However, these last points were included separately in the solution algorithm.\par
To predict the load-deflection relations for the prestressed box beam both without and with CFRP retrofitting, an algorithm is formulated based on the nonlinear moment curvature relations coupled with a finite-difference procedure. Figure \hyperref[fig_8]{7} shows the finitedifference discretization along the longitudinal z axis of the box beam. The node numbers i = 1, 2, ?, N used in the finite-deference formulation are also shown in this figure, with nodes 0 and N+1 as the so-called phantom points. In this study, the segment length h is taken as L/10, where L is the total span of 95 ft. The curvature ? i of the box beam at any node i can be expressed in the following central finite-deference form [15]:? i = ( ?? 2 ?? ???? 2 ) i = V i?1 -2V i + V i+1 h 2\textbf{(18)}\par
In this equation, V i is the deflection at any node i. Applying Equation 18 at i = 1, 2, ?, N, the following matrix expression is obtained:[ Q ] × \{ V \} = h 2 \{ ? \} \{ V \} T = \{ V 0 , V 2 , V 3 , ?, V N-1 , V N+1 \}\par
The curvature vector is defined by:\{ ? \} T = \{ ? 1 , ? 2 , ? 3 , ?, ? N \}\textbf{(21)}\par
In Equation  {\ref 19}, the following zero deflection boundary conditions are incorporated:  V 1 = 0 , V N = 0 © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) 
\section[{Global}]{Global}M IV = 4878P -( 4.279P × z )+( 570w × z )-( w × z 2 /2 ) for 766 in. ? z ? 1140 in\textbf{(22c)}\par
IV. 
\section[{Solution Algorithm}]{Solution Algorithm}\par
where [ Q ] is a N×N coefficient matrix, and \{V\} is a deflection vector defined by: Year 2017 Based on the values found in \{ V \}, the largest deflection is found to be at node 6 when N = 11 is used in the present study. Using this procedure, the loaddeflection curves for the retrofitted cross sections shown in Figures  {\ref 2b-2d}, 2e-2g, and 2h-2j are developed and shown in Figures \hyperref[fig_10]{8-10} including the curve for the nonretrofitted section shown in Figure  {\ref 2a}.\par
Table \hyperref[tab_0]{1} presents a summary of the results based on a rigorous nonlinear analysis of the box beam shown in Figure  {\ref 1}. In this table, c 2 represents the location of the neutral axis at collapse. The values of the collapse load and the corresponding maximum bending moment are represented by P max and M max , respectively. When nondimensionalized using P max and M max values for the non-retrofitted box beam section 2a, they are entered as p max and m max values in this table. It is seen that the p max values for various retrofitting schemes range from 1.05 to 1.52 showing that the retrofitting scheme using section 2j is the most effective of the ones investigated in this study. The range of m max values is seen to be from 1.03 to 1.35. The second most effective retrofitting scheme corresponds to the section 2g providing a p max value of 1.35.\par
Figure  {\ref 11} shows the relationships between box beam moment capacity and the CFRP thickness. The upper curve is for retrofitting with CFRP in both tension and compression, and the lower curve is when CFRP is used only in tension. A comparison of the two curves in this figure shows clearly that CFRP retrofitting is significantly more effective when used in both tension and compression regions.     
\section[{Conclusions}]{Conclusions}\par
The following conclusions are drawn from this study: 1. The use of a 3/16-inch thick CFRP retrofitting layer in both tension and compression regions resulted in the largest increase in the load carrying capacity of the box beam. 2. Retrofitting with CFRP simultaneously in both tension and compression regions is for more effective than retrofitting in just the tensile or the compressive region of the box beam. 3. Retrofitting with CFRP in tension only results in practically the same load carrying capacity of the box beam as that obtained with CFRP in compression only. The nonlinear analysis procedure presented is found to give rapid convergence for the box beam problem studied.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png}
\caption{\label{fig_1}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{23}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png}
\caption{\label{fig_2}Figure 2 :Figure 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png}
\caption{\label{fig_3}Figure 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-6.png}
\caption{\label{fig_4}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5}\includegraphics[]{image-7.png}
\caption{\label{fig_5}Figure 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6510}\includegraphics[]{image-8.png}
\caption{\label{fig_6}Figure 6 : 5 ( 10 )}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7}\includegraphics[]{image-9.png}
\caption{\label{fig_8}Figure 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-10.png}
\caption{\label{fig_9}E}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{8}\includegraphics[]{image-11.png}
\caption{\label{fig_10}Figure 8 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{9}\includegraphics[]{image-12.png}
\caption{\label{fig_11}Figure 9 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1011}\includegraphics[]{image-13.png}
\caption{\label{fig_12}Figure 10 :Figure 11 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-14.png}
\caption{\label{figure14}}\end{figure}
    \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.11063492063492064\textwidth}P{0.1538095238095238\textwidth}P{0.16730158730158728\textwidth}P{0.12142857142857141\textwidth}P{0.17539682539682538\textwidth}P{0.12142857142857141\textwidth}}
Section (Figure 2)\tabcellsep c 2 (in.)\tabcellsep P max (kips)\tabcellsep p max\tabcellsep M max (kip-in.)\tabcellsep m max\\
2a\tabcellsep 16.81\tabcellsep 19.22\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 60749\tabcellsep 1.00\\
2b\tabcellsep 19.02\tabcellsep 20.45\tabcellsep 1.06\tabcellsep 63364\tabcellsep 1.04\\
2c\tabcellsep 13.16\tabcellsep 20.12\tabcellsep 1.05\tabcellsep 62657\tabcellsep 1.03\\
2d\tabcellsep 17.64\tabcellsep 22.73\tabcellsep 1.18\tabcellsep 68175\tabcellsep 1.12\\
2e\tabcellsep 20.3\tabcellsep 21.17\tabcellsep 1.10\tabcellsep 64876\tabcellsep 1.07\\
2f\tabcellsep 10.04\tabcellsep 20.78\tabcellsep 1.08\tabcellsep 64058\tabcellsep 1.05\\
2g\tabcellsep 17.94\tabcellsep 25.98\tabcellsep 1.35\tabcellsep 75069\tabcellsep 1.23\\
2h\tabcellsep 21.38\tabcellsep 21.74\tabcellsep 1.13\tabcellsep 66098\tabcellsep 1.09\\
2i\tabcellsep 7.77\tabcellsep 21.27\tabcellsep 1.11\tabcellsep 65088\tabcellsep 1.07\\
2j\tabcellsep 18.12\tabcellsep 29.19\tabcellsep 1.52\tabcellsep 81852\tabcellsep 1.45\\
VI.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{Year 2017 E CFRP Retrofitting Schemes for Prestressed Concrete Box Beamsfor Highway Bridges © 2017 GlobalJournals Inc. (US)} 			\footnote{Year 2017} 			\footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 		 		\backmatter  			 			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Aashto and Lrfd ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		\textit{American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials},  		 			Aashto 		,  		 			Lrfd 		.  		2014. Loose Leaf.  	 	 (Bridge Design Specifications) 
\bibitem[Rosenboom and Rizkalla ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Strengthened with Various CFRP Systems Subjected to Fatigue Loading’.  		 			O Rosenboom 		,  		 			S Rizkalla 		.  	 	 		\textit{ASCE: Journal of Composites for Construction}  		2006.  (10)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Lin and Burns ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		\textit{Design of prestressed concrete structures},  		 			T Y Lin 		,  		 			N H Burns 		.  		1981. John Wiley \& Sons, Incorporated, New Jersy.  	 
\bibitem[Kim et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Ductility and Cracking Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Beams Strengthened with Prestressed CFRP Sheets’.  		 			Y J Kim 		,  		 			S Chen 		,  		 			M F Green 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Composites for Construction}  		2008.  (12)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Aram et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Effects of Gradually Anchored Prestressed CFRP Strips Bonded on Prestressed Concrete Beams’.  		 			M Aram 		,  		 			C Czaderski 		,  		 			M Motavalli 		,  		 			M 		.  	 	 		\textit{ASCE: Journal of Composites for Construction}  		2008.  (12)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Reed and Peterman ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Evaluation of Prestressed Concrete Girders Strengthened with Carbon fiber reinforced polymer Sheets’.  		 			C E Reed 		,  		 			R J Peterman 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Bridge Engineering}  		2004.  (9)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ritchie et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘External reinforcement of concrete beams using fiber reinforced plastics’.  		 			P A Ritchie 		,  		 			D A Thomas 		,  		 			L W Lu 		,  		 			G M Connelly 		.  	 	 		\textit{ACI Structural Journal, No}  		1991. 88  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Kim et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Flexural behavior of reinforced or prestressed concrete beams including strengthening with prestressed carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheets’.  		 			Y J Kim 		,  		 			M F Green 		,  		 			R Wight 		.  	 	 		\textit{Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering}  		2007.  (34)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rusinowski and Täljsten ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Intermediate Crack Induced Debonding in Concrete Beams Strengthened with CFRP Plates’.  		 			P Rusinowski 		,  		 			B Täljsten 		.  	 	 		\textit{Advances in Structural Engineering}  		2009.  (12)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Grace et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Performance of an AASHTO Beam Bridge Prestressed with CFRP Tendons’.  		 			N Grace 		,  		 			E Jensen 		,  		 			V Matsagar 		,  		 			P Penjendra 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Bridge Engineering}  		2013. 18  (2)  p. .  	 	 (No.) 
\bibitem[Bennitz et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Reinforced Concrete T-Beams Externally Prestressed with Unbonded Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Tendons’.  		 			A Bennitz 		,  		 			J Schmidt 		,  		 			J Nilimaa 		,  		 			B Täljsten 		,  		 			P Goltermann 		,  		 			D Ravn 		.  	 	 		\textit{ACI Structural Journal}  		2012.  (109)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Burningham et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Repair of Prestressed Concrete Beams with Damaged Steel Tendons Using Post-Tensioned Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Rods’.  		 			C A Burningham 		,  		 			C P Pantelides 		,  		 			L D Reaveley 		.  	 	 		\textit{ACI Structural Journal}  		2014.  (111)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Chagnon and Massicotte ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Seismic retrofitting of rectangular bridge piers with CFRP’.  		 			N Chagnon 		,  		 			B Massicotte 		.  	 	 		\textit{Canada}  		2005. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Petro]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		\textit{Series of bridges in phoenix strengthened successfully},  		 			S Petro 		.  		 \url{http://www.gannettfleming.com}  		 	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
