\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2015-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2015)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2015-01-15}
\title{Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Alimasunya  E}

             \affil[1]{  Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 8 December 2014 Accepted: 1 January 2015 Published: 15 January 2015}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A).

\end{abstract}


\keywords{loudspeaker, client, efficiency, analysis, system, reliability, performance.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
oudspeakers and the variety of enclosure box in which they may be mounted have been studied intensively, in order to achieve high quality standards in terms of product performance. These loudspeakers are complex electromechanical systems, with behaviour governed by an interaction of acoustics, electricity and mechanics  {\ref (Basilio et al, 2009)}.\par
In sustaining a loudspeaker, a better policy and strategy were ensured in prolonging the efficiency and usage of this product. A product can be relevant today and be obsolete or irrelevant in the nearest future. According to \hyperref[b14]{Telsang (2006)} ''the main objective of every organization is to satisfy the implied needs of the customer''. Thus, there are needs for an effective decision making and dynamic product restructuring, in order to sustain the relationship existing between the manufacturer and the end-user of the product. Philip Sutton  {\ref (2004)}, argue that sustainability is the balancing or integration of environmental, social, and economic issues. The World commission on Environment and Development (WCED) 1987 defined sustainability as ''the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'' (Oyedepo and  {\ref Olayinka, 2012)}.\par
The object of this study is to critically evaluate and compare relevant factors of sustainability, which are technical, environmental and economical, for two selected models of dynamic loud speakers and deduce the market needs and performance. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Sustainability of Dynamic Loudspeaker}]{Sustainability of Dynamic Loudspeaker}\par
Tore and Uday  {\ref (2003)} suggest that one of the approaches in the sustainability of product such as loudspeakers gives rise to implementation of RAMS in product design and development, this is related to integration of reliability, maintainability and risk analysis tools and methods to enhance performance efficiency, to reduce product life cycle cost (LCC) and delivery time, and to increase customer satisfaction and product attractiveness. The framework of the product manufacturer must define these stages involved in the life cycle of the product. Young (2000) identifies the stages of project life cycles as follows:\par
1. Product conception 2. Product definition 3. Product planning 4. Product launch and execution 5. Product closure 6. Post-product evaluation\par
The demand of the consumers must be the basic for redesigning of the loudspeakers as they are the customers with kin interest in the technicality of the speakers, the economical and environment friendliness of the loudspeaker product. This performance map can be bridge by closing the reliability gap that exists in the existing product and the desired once. \hyperref[b5]{Nave (2006)} describes the mechanism of loudspeaker as an electromechanical process in which the amplified audio signal moves the speaker cone in order to produce sound corresponding to the original sound wave or audio signal. \hyperref[b5]{Nave (2006)} explains that the audio signal of a dynamic loudspeaker produces an electrical signal with the same harmonic and frequency of the audio signal and a sound image that reflects the relative intensity of the audio signal and sound as it changes. It amplifier magnifies the electrical signal in order to power the coils of a loudspeaker, and it transferred the electrical signal to the voice coils of the loudspeaker. This creates a vibration in the voice coil with a vibrating sequence corresponding to the variations of the original sound signal. The purpose of this voice coil is to power the cone of the loudspeaker which drives the air surrounding it, and this in turn produces audio sound outwardly of the original audio signal. Most loudspeakers are enclosed in such a way that it generates pleasant sound.\par
The diaphragm in a dynamic loudspeaker is connected to a voice coil positioned in the air space of a magnet system with the aid of a flexible suspension. Immediately the current flows through the voice coil in the presence of a magnetic field, both the diaphragm and coil are accelerated as a result of theLorentz force. Both an inhomogeneous magnetic field and the excursion-dependent stiffness of the suspension account for a nonlinear behaviour of the transducer.  {\ref (Dietrich et. al, 2001)}.\par
The nature of the voice coil and the kind of enclosure of the loudspeaker actually reflects the quality of sound from these speakers, thus there is need to reengineer and redesign the loudspeaker component and compartment in order to boost its sustainability \hyperref[b5]{(Nave, 2006)}.\par
Based on this, Client A's concern is on optimum performance and minimum emphasis on life cycle cost and environmental impart, with a 90\% technical performance, 30 \% environmental performance and 50\% economic performance.Client B is highly environmental conscious in line with regulations irrespective of the cost of implementing a well functional loudspeaker, with a 90\% environmental performance, 50\% economic performance and 30\% technical performance. 
\section[{III. Reliability of Dynamic Loudspeaker}]{III. Reliability of Dynamic Loudspeaker}\par
The loudspeaker comprises a bass speaker, woofers large to efficiently impedance match to the air, tweeters with high frequency sound signal, framework and enclosure box. In order for a more reliable performance in terms of audio output, the aperture is made on the enclosure to assist in echoing the sound from the loudspeaker in form of sub-woofer. The complete life cycle of the loud speaker is taken to consideration, from manufacturing stage of it subcomponents, to the components assembling, the distribution of the speakers and its exact life spam in the hands of the customers. This defines the performance of the loudspeaker and its durability, which can be computed by software.Software is design which focused on final with emphases on the parameter relationships of the speakers. The purpose of the software is to avoid the computation of equations governing loudspeaker systems and to highlight the features the designed loudspeaker before production as reviewed by  {\ref (Basilio et al, 2009)}. 
\section[{IV. Supportability and Sustainability Index of DYnamic Loudspeaker}]{IV. Supportability and Sustainability Index of DYnamic Loudspeaker}\par
A thorough sequence of step-by-step processes involved in the product redesign is study so ''Due to design problems and poor product support, manufacturer equipment and systems are not able to meet these requirements. However with proper consideration of reliability, availability, maintainability and supportability(RAMS) in the design, manufacturing, and assembly phase of the dynamic loudspeaker, the number of failure could be reduced and their consequences minimized''.  {\ref (Saraswat and Yada 2008)} In the quest for system sustainability, most products fails to sustain in meeting the manufacturer goals if its design is no longer compatible with the objective, vision, culture and structure of the manufacturing firm in the face of present development. So a product must be of positive socio-economic significance to both the manufacturer and the customers with little or no effects on the human environment.\par
The product can then be redesign by introducing present constrains or necessity the existing once fails to handled, and reengineered in such a way that the system of the product can be well supported, and this will not affect the life cycle of the product. At this phase, the manufacturer tends to put in all available resources in re-building a new product with high level of system supportability and acceptability.\par
"A parametric loudspeaker has a potential of fascinating usage because it has a sharp directivity compared to a conventional loudspeaker, and is then feasible to transmit speech or audio signals to a specific area that cannot be detected by people in adjacent locations. Especially, such kind of loudspeakers enables us to create quietsound environments outside the area and to retain private listening space"(Sakaiand Kamakura, 2008).\par
V. 
\section[{Life Cycle Assessment of the Loudspeaker}]{Life Cycle Assessment of the Loudspeaker}\par
Sustainability and Life Cycle Management (LCM) of product is focused on information management of system, effective reengineering and product redesigning and system analysis associating with product customer's response. This creates a road map of the product from the manufacturer down to the customers with a corresponding constraint and feedback at each stage of the road map or pathway (Lecturer's note, 2013). At a glance, one can tell the level of product sustainability, when to enhance or modify the product and the development of new product. 
\section[{VI.}]{VI.} 
\section[{Technological Obsolescence}]{Technological Obsolescence}\par
The life cycle of the dynamic loudspeaker system is considered as a device ranging from  
\section[{VII. Material Utilization Principle/Life Cycle Costing and Economic Analysis}]{VII. Material Utilization Principle/Life Cycle Costing and Economic Analysis}\par
The voice of customer was the most important factor in designing these Loudspeakers in other to satisfy their needs. In view of this, quality function deployment (QFD) has to be employed in other to developed ''technical specifications that can be used by designer and production''  {\ref Telsang (2006,p.547)}. Loudspeaker is usually enclosed in a box or single compartment, and the resulting sound output was not meeting the desired taste of its customers. In restructuring this compartment, one must first define the type of vibration emanating from the voice coil and its sound. So the question is "what is the strength of the electric signal powering the voice coil?" It is discovered that the level of vibration of a lighter voice cone is different from that of a heavier voice cone when subjected to the same electrical signal. Thus, in redesigning of a loudspeaker, a light voice coil is used which can vibrate freely inside the magnetic field of a strong permanent magnet. The efficiency of the producing Loudspeaker with the above component is 20.4\%, which needs improvement in boosting its usability. 
\section[{b) Technical Description of Producing Loudspeaker for Client A i. Product A}]{b) Technical Description of Producing Loudspeaker for Client A i. Product A}\par
Technically is made up of a heavier voice coil and cone, with a moderate sound output and intensity. It is composed of multiple loudspeakers, since a single loudspeaker cannot deliver optimally balanced sound desired by the customer over the audio sound spectrum. Typically, these loudspeakers are enclosed with a crossover network to produce a nearly uniform frequency. This is done in order to minimize the impact of this resonant frequency among the speakers.\par
The compartment speakers comprises of a tweeters (with high frequency sound signal),a bass speaker to balance the audio sound, a woofer and subwoofer.\par
Thus, in producing loudspeaker with 90\% technical performance, 30 \% environmental performance and 50\% economic performance, emphases must be on improving the quality of the subwoofer speaker, by replacing the existing one with a more powerful and reliable one (with about a moderate cost and same component weight). The efficiency of Client A producing a Loudspeaker with an improved Sub-woofer having same weight and a cost of £0.72 (because it is the main component that can increase the technicality performance of the loud speaker), will increase from 20.4\% to 62.5\% performance, thus boosting its usability and market value a. System Reliability The loudspeaker is design for a life span of 5 years, of which the loudspeaker compartment is at use at 14 hours a day (both usage and standby) and switch off at 10 hours a day.\par
For 5 years, the total operating hours of the loudspeaker = 14x365x5= 25,550 hours In assumption, 1 system fails in every 5,000 hours, an average of 5 loudspeakers is likely to fail throughout the life cycle of the system. Failure rate of the loudspeaker for Client A: ?= number of failure\textbackslash total operating hours = 5\textbackslash  25,550 = 0.0001957 MTBF = 1\textbackslash ? = 1\textbackslash  0.0001957 = 5109.86 hours The Reliability of the loudspeaker at 5 years of 25,550 operating hours, R (t) = e -?t = e -t/m = e -0.0001957 x 25550 = 0.0067  {\ref (Telsang , 2006 pp.488-494)} The probability of the loudspeaker surviving for 25,550 operating hours is 0.67\%.\par
ii. 
\section[{Maintainabilityof Dynamic Loudspeaker System}]{Maintainabilityof Dynamic Loudspeaker System}\par
The loudspeaker system for Client A to have high surviving rate and high reliability, the operating hours must be reduced from the total life span of 5 years, by neutralizing the standby period of the system. It is advisable that, when the system is not in use, the relative power supply into the loudspeaker will be zero, thereby reducing the usability of the system from 14 hours to an average of 5 hours by day (the direct usability period), therefore the operating hours at more improved system will be, Operation hours = 5x365x5= 9125 hours. This will increase the survival of the system to R(t) = e -0.0001957 x 9125 = 16.7\% It is advisable that the life span of the loudspeaker be reduced as well as it operation hours in order to increase its reliability. Economic Descriptions of Loudspeaker A Economically, the cost of producing this product, increases from £2.13 to £2.63, which is relatively low and it can easily be afforded by most customers, with more value for their money and improved technical performance. The problem associated to this product is that when placed in a very wide sitting room such as shown in Fig 4 below, the efficiency of the loudspeaker reduces. It is manufactured for indoor purpose and cannot be used for outdoor purposes.  
\section[{Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volum}]{Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volum} 
\section[{Environmental Effects of Loudspeaker A}]{Environmental Effects of Loudspeaker A}\par
The environmental effects of the loudspeaker is relatively low, it can pose a major threat if the speaker is turn to its maximum volume, and this is dangerous to human ear, as it can affect the ear drum. with optimally balanced sound delivery. Typically, these loudspeakers are enclosed with a crossover network to produce a nearly uniform frequency, with a woofer compartment. This loudspeaker requires more power input in driving all components effectively and the resonant frequency among the loudspeakers is minimized as well. A speaker comprises of tweeters (with high frequency sound signal) and a bass speaker is a superb woofer with a bass reflex enclosure used and extending the bass range of the loudspeakers. Thus, in producing loudspeaker for Client B is highly environmental conscious in line with regulations irrespective of the cost of implementing a well functional loudspeaker, with a 90\% environmental performance, 50\% economic performance and 30\% technical performance. The efficiency of Client B producing a Loudspeaker with improved materials that is more environmental friendly will increase from 20.1\%. Technically the loudspeaker performance is low, with a moderate cost of production, with materials that have very low or negligible environmental effects.\par
i. 
\section[{System Reliability}]{System Reliability}\par
The loudspeaker is design for a life span of 5 years, of which the loudspeaker compartment is at use at 14 hours a day (both usage and standby) and switch off at 10 hours a day.\par
For 5 years, the total operating hours of the loudspeaker = 14x365x5= 25,550 hours In assumption, 2 system fails in every 5,000 hours, thus an average of 10 loudspeakers is likely to fail throughout the life cycle of the system (due to low technical performance). Failure rate of the loudspeaker for Client A; = e -0.00039147 x 25550 = 0.9999 The probability of the loudspeaker surviving for 25,550 operating hours is 99.9\%. This implies that the system has very negligible failure rate.\par
Thus, for the loudspeaker system for Client B have a high surviving rate and high reliability, the operating hours must be maintained with the total life span of 5 years, and a powerful standby system. It is advisable that the life span of the loudspeaker be maintained as well as it operation hours for effective performance and system reliability \hyperref[b14]{(Telsang, 2006)}. gives the loudspeaker more driving force in powering it sound output, and the resulting output is a smooth sound with a high audio intensity. 
\section[{Global Journal of Researches in Engineering}]{Global Journal of Researches in Engineering}\par
The purpose of the woofer speaker is to serve as an impedance match to the surrounding or air, this Economic Description of Product B Economically, the cost of producing loudspeaker for Client B is £3.29, this product is relatively high but it is still afforded by most customers. The loudspeaker is design for both sitting rooms, indoor and outdoor purposes.\par
The loudspeaker is more reliable with an efficiency of 20.1\%, and a system reliability of 99.0\%. Although, it mean time between failure (MTBF) is 2555 hours, which can be improve upon by a well supporting system that can regulate the energy supply to the system, reduces system vibration, and temperature, which can account for system failure (apart from factory fault).    
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
The market needs of client A and B product indicate that product B is more sustainable than A because it has 90\% Environmental performance,30\% technical performance and 50\% economic performance. Since product A can only be used for indoor purposes while product B can be used for both indoors and outdoors purposes it therefore means that in terms of sustainability, reliability, life cycle assessment, affordability client B product is the best. The environmental effects of these products are very low or negligible with little effects on human hearing since it maximum sound output which is moderate to the hearing of the ear with a relatively low noise pollution, and its recyclability has no environmental effects when burnt and the unused once can be disposed by burning. The table above shows that client B is more than client A in terms of sustainability. By comparing the product of client A and B using the parameters above, shows that client A has 100\% product sustainability while client B has about 106\%. This implies that client B's product has 6\% performance sustainability rate more than client A's product. 
\section[{Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volum}]{Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volum} 
\section[{VIII. Comparative Analysis of Products a and b}]{VIII. Comparative Analysis of Products a and b}\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{23}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}Fig. 2 :Fig. 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png}
\caption{\label{fig_1}Fig. 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png}
\caption{\label{fig_2}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png}
\caption{\label{fig_3}}\end{figure}
    \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
Year 2015\\
2\\
III Version I\\
e XV Issue\\
( ) Volum A\\
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: © 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US)]} 
\caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.6051572327044025\textwidth}P{0.08232704402515724\textwidth}P{0.06842767295597484\textwidth}P{0.0940880503144654\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year 2015\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep XV Issue III Version I\\
Component Material utilization m MA 0.185 1.5\textbackslash 8.1 MB 0.247 2.0\textbackslash 8.1 MC 0.173 1.4\textbackslash 8.1 MD 0.222 1.8\textbackslash 8.1 ME 0.173 1.4/8.1 TOTAL Weight of loudspeaker compartment-8.1 kg production Cost of /component y £0.95 £0.58 £0.18 £0.20 £0.22 £2.13 a) Material description MA-Pioneer TS-G1321i 13cm dual cone speaker system 200 Watts, 1.5kg\tabcellsep Relative Production Cost X=y\textbackslash ?y 0.446 0.272 0.085 0.094 0.103 1\tabcellsep Partial utilization value mX 0.083 0.067 0.015 0.021 0.018 0.204\tabcellsep ( ) Volume A of Researches in Engineering Global Journal\\
MB-Loudspeaker enclosure box, 2.0kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MC-Tweeter speaker, 1.4kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MD-Woofer, 1.8kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
ME-Sub-woofer, 1.4kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Material Utility (m) = `Wcomponent \textbackslash  W material used\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
( Lecturer's note, 2013)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: © 20 15 Global Journals Inc. (US)]} 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.07103064066852367\textwidth}P{0.329108635097493\textwidth}P{0.14442896935933147\textwidth}P{0.1681058495821727\textwidth}P{0.1373259052924791\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep Material utilization\tabcellsep Cost of\tabcellsep Relative\tabcellsep Partial utilization\\
Component\tabcellsep (m)\tabcellsep production\tabcellsep Production\tabcellsep value\\
Number\tabcellsep \tabcellsep /component (y)\tabcellsep Cost (X=y\textbackslash ?y)\tabcellsep (mX)\\
MA\tabcellsep 0.185\tabcellsep £0.95\tabcellsep 0.361\tabcellsep 0.067\\
\tabcellsep 1.5\textbackslash 8.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MB\tabcellsep 0.247\tabcellsep £0.58\tabcellsep 0.221\tabcellsep 0.055\\
\tabcellsep 2.0\textbackslash 8.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MC\tabcellsep 0.173\tabcellsep £0.18\tabcellsep 0.068\tabcellsep 0.012\\
\tabcellsep 1.4\textbackslash 8.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MD\tabcellsep 0.222\tabcellsep £0.20\tabcellsep 0.076\tabcellsep 0.017\\
\tabcellsep 1.8\textbackslash 8.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
ME\tabcellsep 0.173\tabcellsep £0.72\tabcellsep 0.274\tabcellsep 0.474\\
\tabcellsep 1.4/8.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
TOTAL\tabcellsep \tabcellsep £2.63\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0.625\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.11546242774566473\textwidth}P{0.28497109826589595\textwidth}P{0.1449421965317919\textwidth}P{0.16705202312138728\textwidth}P{0.1375722543352601\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Component Material utilization m}\tabcellsep Cost of\tabcellsep Relative\tabcellsep Partial utilization\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep production\tabcellsep Production\tabcellsep value\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep /component y\tabcellsep Cost\tabcellsep mX\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep X=y\textbackslash ?y\tabcellsep \\
MA\tabcellsep 0.185\tabcellsep £1.05\tabcellsep 0.319\tabcellsep 0.059\\
\tabcellsep 1.7\textbackslash 9.2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MB\tabcellsep 0.247\tabcellsep £0.88\tabcellsep 0.268\tabcellsep 0.066\\
\tabcellsep 2.2\textbackslash 9.2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MC\tabcellsep 0.173\tabcellsep £0.28\tabcellsep 0.085\tabcellsep 0.015\\
\tabcellsep 1.4\textbackslash 9.2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
MD\tabcellsep 0.222\tabcellsep £0.30\tabcellsep 0.091\tabcellsep 0.020\\
\tabcellsep 2.0\textbackslash 9.2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
ME\tabcellsep 0.173\tabcellsep £0.78\tabcellsep 0.237\tabcellsep 0.041\\
\tabcellsep 1.9/9.2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
TOTAL\tabcellsep \tabcellsep £3.29\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0.201\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.6184587813620072\textwidth}P{0.01827956989247312\textwidth}P{0.0913978494623656\textwidth}P{0.09749103942652329\textwidth}P{0.024372759856630823\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Technical performance}\tabcellsep Environmental\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Economic performance Total}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep performance\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Client A\tabcellsep 0.9\tabcellsep 0.3\tabcellsep 0.5\tabcellsep 0.17\\
Client B\tabcellsep 0.3\tabcellsep 0.9\tabcellsep 0.5\tabcellsep 0.17\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Client B is most sustainable in terms of market}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{needs because of high environmental performance of}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{90\% and 30\% technical and 50\% economic}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
performance respectively.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
IX.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5775\textwidth}P{0.1375\textwidth}P{0.13499999999999998\textwidth}}
PARAMETERS\tabcellsep CLIENT A\tabcellsep CLIENT B\\
System Reliability\tabcellsep 0.68\tabcellsep 0.73\\
System Supportability\tabcellsep 0.92\tabcellsep 0.67\\
Sustainability Index\tabcellsep 0.12\tabcellsep 0.24\\
Life Cycle Assessment\tabcellsep 0.12\tabcellsep 0.21\\
Material Utility Principle\tabcellsep 0.03\tabcellsep 0.01\\
Maintainability\tabcellsep 0.001\tabcellsep 0.002\\
Life Cycle Costing and Economic Analysis\tabcellsep 0.41\tabcellsep 0.21\\
Technological Obsolescence\tabcellsep 0.51\tabcellsep 0.31\\
Energy Use\tabcellsep 0.005\tabcellsep 0.07\\
Resource Management\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.31\\
TOTAL\tabcellsep 0.304\tabcellsep 0.332\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: Average mean ratio = client A/client B: client B / client A 1.057 1]} 
\caption{\label{tab_6}Table 5 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker} 			\footnote{Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker} 			\footnote{© 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 		 		\backmatter  			 			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Chbase]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		\textit{},  		 			/ Chbase 		.  		 	 
\bibitem[Chand & Company Ltd and Newdelhi]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		\textit{},  		 			S Chand \& Company Ltd 		,  		 			Newdelhi 		.  		 	 
\bibitem[Hironaka et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		\textit{},  		 			Y Hironaka 		,  		 			S Adachi 		,  		 			F Nagayama 		.  		 TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER.  		2007.  	 
\bibitem[Paul ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		\textit{},  		 			M C G Paul 		.  		 \url{http://www.DaedalusAudioDA-1\textunderscore 1speaker.mht}  		2011.  	 
\bibitem[March ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		\textit{},  		 			March 		.  		 \url{<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/\%E2\%80\%8}  		2013.  	 
\bibitem[Fresnor ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		\textit{-09-01) cleaner production as means for effective environmental management},  		 			J Fresnor 		.  		1998. Cleaner Production. 6 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Pueo et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘A pedagogical software for the analysis of loudspeaker systems. Education’.  		 			B Pueo 		,  		 			M Romá 		,  		 			J Escolano 		,  		 			J J López 		.  	 	 		\textit{IEEE Transactions}  		2009. 52  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Shen et al. ()]{b33}\label{b33} 	 		\textit{Accelerated Power Test Analysis Based on Loudspeaker Life Distribution},  		 			Y Shen 		,  		 			X Wang 		,  		 			Z Wu 		.  		2012. p. 1.  	 
\bibitem[Agroforestry Systems]{b32}\label{b32} 	 		\textit{Agroforestry Systems},  				61 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Fan et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Application of Reverse Engineering Technology in the Green Remanufacture Engineering’.  		 			W Fan 		,  		 			X Liu 		,  		 			W D Wang 		.  	 	 		\textit{Advanced Materials Research}  		2010. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Larsen et al. ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		\textit{Audio bandwidth extension: application of psychoacoustics, signal processing and loudspeaker design},  		 			E R Larsen 		,  		 			R M Aarts 		,  		 			J Wiley 		.  		2004. Wiley.  	 
\bibitem[Davis and Mermelstein ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		\textit{Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences},  		 			S Davis 		,  		 			P Mermelstein 		.  		1980.  	 
\bibitem[Singla et al. ()]{b35}\label{b35} 	 		‘Development of aluminium based silicon’.  		 			M Singla 		,  		 			D D Dwivedi 		,  		 			L Singh 		,  		 			V Chawla 		.  	 	 		\textit{of Minerals \& Materials Characterization \& Engineering}  		2009. 10  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Gander ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		‘Dynamic linearity and power compression in moving-coil loudspeakers’.  		 			M R Gander 		.  	 	 		\textit{Watermark}  		2012. p. 1.  	 
\bibitem[Sakai and Kamakura ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		\textit{Dynamic single sideband modulation for realizing parametric loudspeaker AIP Conference Proceeding},  		 			S Sakai 		,  		 			T Kamakura 		.  		2008. p. 613.  	 
\bibitem[Sakai and Kamakura ()]{b30}\label{b30} 	 		\textit{Dynamic single sideband modulation for realizing parametric loudspeaker AIP Conference Proceeding},  		 			S Sakai 		,  		 			T Kamakura 		.  		2008. p. 613.  	 
\bibitem[Kang and Schoenung ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		\textit{Electronic waste recycling: A review of US infrastructure and technology options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling},  		 			H Kang 		,  		 			J M Schoenung 		.  		2005. 45 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Olayinka]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Energy Efficiency and Conservation Measures: Tools for Sustainable Energy Development in Nigeria’.  		 			S Olayinka 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Energy Engineering}  		 	 
\bibitem[Murayama and Homma ()]{b29}\label{b29} 	 		\textit{Environmentally resistant loudspeaker},  		 			F Murayama 		,  		 			Y Homma 		.  		1990.  	 
\bibitem[Vincent et al. ()]{b36}\label{b36} 	 		‘Factors influencing pulmonary resistance’.  		 			N Vincent 		,  		 			R Knudson 		,  		 			D Leith 		,  		 			P Macklem 		,  		 			J Mead 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of applied physiology}  		1970. 29  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Xiao et al. ()]{b38}\label{b38} 	 		‘Flexible, stretchable, transparent carbon nanotube thin film loudspeakers’.  		 			L Xiao 		,  		 			Z Chen 		,  		 			C Feng 		,  		 			L Liu 		,  		 			Z Bai 		,  		 			Y Wang 		,  		 			L Qian 		,  		 			Y Zhang 		,  		 			Q Li 		,  		 			K Jiang 		.  	 	 		\textit{Nano letters}  		2008. 8  (12)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Arnold et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Fundamental frequency-sound pressure level profiles of adult male and female voices’.  		 			H Arnold 		,  		 			I Crandall 		,  		 			R F Coleman 		,  		 			J H Mabis 		,  		 			J K Hinson 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research}  		1917. 1977. 19  (2)  p. 197.  	 	 (Physical Review) 
\bibitem[Guinée ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		\textit{Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. The international journal of life cycle assessment},  		 			J B Guinée 		.  		2002. 7 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Nave ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		\textit{HyperphysicsJanuary-last updateAtlanta},  		 			R Nave 		.  		2006.  		 			Georgian State University 		 	 
\bibitem[Akmam et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘Inculcation of environment-friendly ethics as a prerequisite for sustainable development in Bangladesh’.  		 			W Akmam 		,  		 			M Shahjahan 		,  		 			M F Islam 		.  	 	 		\textit{Asia Pacific Perspectives on Environmental Ethics}  		2008.  	 
\bibitem[Telsang ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{Industrial engineering and production management},  		 			M Telsang 		.  		2006.  	 	 (First ed. RajendraRavinda Printers) 
\bibitem[Markeset and Kumar ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Integration of RAMS and risk analysis in product design and development work processes: a case study’.  		 			T Markeset 		,  		 			U Kumar 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering}  		2003. 9  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Duan et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Life cycle assessment study of a Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker Chinese desktop personal computer’.  		 			H Duan 		,  		 			M Eugster 		,  		 			R Hischier 		,  		 			M Streicher-Porte 		,  		 			J Li 		.  	 	 		\textit{Science of the total environment}  		2009. 407  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Li et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		‘Lifecycle Sustainable Information Management for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment’.  		 			W Li 		,  		 			K Xia 		,  		 			L Gao 		.  	 	 		\textit{Cloud Manufacturing},  				2013. Springer.  	 
\bibitem[Irrgang et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		\textit{Loudspeaker Testing at the Production Line},  		 			S Irrgang 		,  		 			W Klippel 		,  		 			U Seidel 		.  		2012. p. 6845.  	 	 (AES Preprint) 
\bibitem[Singh and Davar ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Noise pollutionsources, effects and control’.  		 			N Singh 		,  		 			S Davar 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Human Ecology}  		2004. 16  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Singh and Davar ()]{b34}\label{b34} 	 		‘Noise pollutionsources, effects and control’.  		 			N Singh 		,  		 			S Davar 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Human Ecology}  		2004. 16  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Kunst et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		‘Outdoor air temperature and mortality in the Netherlands: a time-series analysis’.  		 			A E Kunst 		,  		 			C W Looman 		,  		 			J P Mackenbach 		.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Epidemiology}  		1993. 137  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Shapiro and Rosenquist ()]{b31}\label{b31} 	 		\textit{Public/private partnerships in agroforestry: the example of working together to improve cocoa sustainability},  		 			H Shapiro 		,  		 			E Rosenquist 		.  		2004.  	 
\bibitem[Acoustics]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		‘Speech and Signal Processing’.  		 			Acoustics 		.  	 	 		\textit{IEEE Transactions}  		28  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Oduoza ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		\textit{Sustainability and Life Cycle Management Material Utilization Principle},  		 			C Oduoza 		.  		2013.  	 
\bibitem[Martin and Przybocki ()]{b28}\label{b28} 	 		‘The NIST 1999 speaker recognition evaluation-An overview’.  		 			A Martin 		,  		 			M Przybocki 		.  	 	 		\textit{Digital signal processing}  		2000. 10  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Williams ()]{b37}\label{b37} 	 		\textit{Waste treatment and disposal},  		 			P T Williams 		.  		1998.  	 
\bibitem[WilsonAudio's Alexandria x-2 ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		\textit{WilsonAudio's Alexandria x-2},  		2004.  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
