Integrated Review of Thermo-Physical Properties of Different Ceramic Coatings to make them Suitable for Internal Combustion Engines

Table of contents

1. Introduction

he ceramic coatings on metallic materials have shown significant improvements since 1970. For the aim of the thermal barrier coatings, thermal expansion, thermal conductivity, wear properties, creep and corrosion resistance are important properties. The flame spray and plasma spray techniques are the two main coating techniques used these days. The application of ceramic for thermal barrier coating in adiabatic engines started from 1980. First of all gas turbine wings were used in the area, and then piston, cylinder liner, valve, piston crown surface were used for ceramic coatings.

The experimental bonding strength values of ceramic coatings given by some researchers [1][2][3][4] show clear changes. Literature data on the bonding strength of ceramic coatings demonstrated that the plasmasprayed ceramic coatings have a higher bonding strength than flame-sprayed coatings do [5]. Eichhorn F et al. [6] has shown that a bonding strength value of pure alumina was less than the bonding strength of stabilized alumina. The bonding strength of a ceramic coatingwith a bonding coating is higher than that of Authors ? ? : Mechanical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur (H.P.), India. e-mail: [email protected] without bonding coating. The work of Unger R H andGates et al. [7,8] shows that the adhesion strength between the substrate and the ceramic coating could be improved by a NiAl bonding coating.

Few researchers have shown that within the coating materials zirconia ceramics as wear resistance material have been extensively considered for engineering applications [9][10][11].

Latest works expose that microstructure and mechanical properties, such as grain size [12][13][14][15][16], porosity [17], hardness [18,19], fracture toughness [20], have strong effect on abrasive sliding wear resistance of bulk ceramics and coatings under dry or lubrication circumstances. Due to reduction in the grain size of ceramics their mechanical properties would be improved [21,22], which is helpful in improving the abrasive sliding wear resistance of bulk ceramics and coatings [23][24][25].

2. II.

3. Plasma Spraying Technique

The plasma powder is getting through plasma gas and sprayed on substrate, this phenomenon is known to be plasma spraying technique. At plasma spray technique, the coating powder can be sent by a plasma gas. Between two electrodes plasma is formed and powder is deposited in plasma arc. The plasma gas is usually argon or nitrogen. At plasma spraying technique, when argon, hydrogen or nitrogen gases are used, oxidation problem is minimized. For this reason, plasma spraying techniques have found useful application. One of the advantages of plasma spraying is that it makes possible to coat with high melting point materials.

4. III.

5. Experimental Studies a) Thermal Torch Experiment (Flame Punching Experiment)

In this experiment for application to certain area, thermal barrier coatings are exposed to flame. In this area, some deformation is observed and lower working temperature is required. Thermal torch experiment is applied to measure the strength of coating layer to hot flame. In the experiment work of some researchers [5][6][7] T

6. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering

Volume XIII Issue X Version I 39 ( ) A Year flame is applied with a distance of 10mm using an oxyacetylene torch. Pressure of acetylene is kept 100 kPa. Heat is directly applied to sample and punching times are measured. The sample dimensions are chosen according to ASTM standard to be as 100x50x1.5 mm.

7. a) Thermal Shock Experiment

There are many applications areas of thermal barrier coating and one of them is used in high temperature requirement area. In this area samples are exposed to thermal cycling. Thermal shock experiment is aimed to find the place in which the sample destroyed. The thermal shock experiment is applied according to ASTM C 385-58 standard. During the experiment, samples are heated at certain temperature and waited for uniform distribution of temperature and are put immediately into water to provide thermal shock.

IV.

8. Results and Discussions a) Thermal Resistance

In the work of Serdar et al. [26] the test results were evaluated on the basis of the time required for drilling a hole through the coated specimens. Results are shown in table 1. As it can be seen from table 2 ceramic coating greatly enhances the life of the complete composite structure. It can also be seen from table 1 that zirconia with NiAl bonding coating supplied the maximum performance (deforming in 47 s) and chromium-oxide with NiAl bonding coating illustrated the second performance (with 37 s) and finally alumina with NiAl bonding coating was deformed within 31 s giving the weakest performance. Figs. 1-4 show the view of deformed samples with/without bonding coating. During the flame tests on thermal barrier coatings resistance to high temperatures is observed as these ceramics extend the life of composite structure. The life of base materials definitely increases with the application of ceramic coating. b) Thermal Shock Properties Table 2 shows the test results of thermal shock experiment shown by Serdar et al. [26]. In this test zirconia coated samples deformed at 1040 oC after 37 s and this is the best result in the experiment. Then chromium-oxide coated specimens performed the second thermal shock resistance and they are deformed at 960 oC after 33 s, and finally the alumina coated samples are deformed at 920 oC in 31 s. After thermal shock experiment it can be seen that vertical cracks are initiated in all samples and the reason for the formation of vertical cracks can be explained by thermal shock due to high cooling rate of the tests. In alumina and zirconia coated samples, the cracks are formed in much less quantity compared to other coated samples [11,[27][28][29].

Thermal shock tests are applied to the coated specimens in order to observe their mechanical behaviour under the stresses due to thermal expansion mismatch between the coating and the substrate. It has been shown that coatings are resistance to rapid changes in temperature in spite of the difference in their thermal expansion coefficients.

9. Conclusions

Thermal barrier coated samples are directly exposed to flame (for example combustion rooms in rocket and gas turbines). The view of flame application area shows significant deformation. For this reason, lower working temperature is chosen and figure of merit is decreased. There are many different usage areas of thermal barrier coatings. One of them is the high temperature area. The coating is exposed to thermal cycling. The time of cycling is lower in engine with piston. In literature, piston crown surface, cylinder cover and valve parts are coated with ceramics. Beside these, piston rings and cylinder liner are coated with ceramics. With the thermal shock and the thermal torch experiments, it is shown that the coated materials have higher resistance to high temperatures. Zirconia coating has the best properties in thermal shock and thermal punching experiments. With zirconia coating the figure of merit of engine part will be increased.

Figure 1. Figure 1 :
1Figure 1 : Deformed Cr2O3 (Chromium-oxide) sample without bonding coating after flame torch experiment [26]
Figure 2. Figure 2 :
2Figure 2 : Deformed Cr2O3 (Chromium-oxide) sample with bonding coating after flame torch experiment[26]
Figure 3. Figure 3 :
3Figure 3 : Deformed Al2O3 (Alumina) sample withoutbonding coating after flame torch experiment[26]
Figure 4. Figure 4 :
4Figure 4 : Deformed Al2O3 (Alumina) sample with bonding coating after flame torch experiment[26]
Figure 5. Table 1 :
1
Figure 6. Table 3 :
3
Coating Substrate Deformed Deformed
materials time (s) temperature
( o C)
With
Zirconia bonding 37 1040
(ZrO 2 ) coating
Without 35 1000
bonding
coating
With
Alumina bonding 31 920
(Al 2 O 3 ) coating
Without 20 700
bonding
coating
With
Chromium- bonding 33 960
oxide coating
(Cr 2 O 3 ) Without 21 720
bonding
coating
V.
1
18

Appendix A

Appendix A.1

Appendix B

  1. , A Ambroz , Kaspar J Zvaranie . 1982. 10 p. 363.
  2. , A Matt?ng , B Delventhal , Metalloberflache . 1966. 20 p. 424.
  3. Plasma Spray coating. Department of MaterialsEngineering, C C Berndt . 1985. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University.
  4. Effects of material properties and testing parameters on wear properties of fine-grain zirconia (TZP). C T Yang , W J Wei . Wear 2000. 242 p. .
  5. Abrasive wearbehaviour of conventional and nanocomposite HVOF-sprayed WC-Co coatings. D A Stewart , P H Shipway , D G Mccartney . Wear 1999. p. .
  6. Abrasive Wear of tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramics. D Wang , Z Mao . J Chin Ceram Soc 1995. 23 (5) p. .
  7. , F E?chhorn , J Metzler , Metalloberflache . 1968. 22 p. 225.
  8. Wear and friction characteristics of ion-implanted zirconia ceramics. G B Stachowiak , G W Stachowiak , P Evans . Wear 2000. 241 p. .
  9. Mechanical properties of ultra-fine grained zirconia ceramics. Gsam Theunissen , J S Bouma , Aja Winnubst , A J Burggraag . J Mater Sci 1992. 27 (14) p. .
  10. Friction and wear behaviour of implanted AISI316LSS and comparison with a substrate. H Dogan , F Findik , O Morgul . Mater Des 2002. 23 (7) p. .
  11. Comparative study of wear mechanism of surface treated AISI 316L stainless steel. H Dogan , F Findik , A Oztarhan . IndLubrTribol 2003. 55 (2-3) p. .
  12. Effect of grain size on friction and sliding wear of oxide ceramics. K H Zumgahr , W Bundschuh , B Zimmerlin . Wear 1993. p. .
  13. , L Urtekin . 2001. Kutahya. Dumlupinar University (M.Sc Thesis)
  14. , M Dem?rc? . 1994. Istanbul. Marmara University (M.Sc Thesis)
  15. Plasma-sprayed oxide ceramics on steel substrates. M Vural , S Zeytin , A H Ucisik . Surf Coat Technol 1997. 97 p. .
  16. Friction and wear of partially stabilized zirconia: basic science and practical applications. Rhj Hannink , M J Murray , H G Scott . Wear 1984. 100 p. .
  17. R H Unger . Proceedings of the National Thermal SprayConference, (the National Thermal SprayConferenceOrlando, FL
    ) 1987. p. .
  18. Microstructural effects on the friction and wear of zirconia films in unlubricated sliding contact. S C Moulzolf , R J Lad , P J Blau . Thin Solid Films 1999. 347 p. .
  19. , S Salman . 1995. YildizTehnical University (Ph.D Thesis)
  20. Stud ies of the correlation between wear behaviour and bonding strength in two types of ceramic coating. S Salman , Cizmeciog . J Mater Sci 1998. 33 p. .
  21. An investigation of different ceramic coating thermal properties. S Salman , R Kose , L Urtekin , F Findik . Materials and Design 2006. 27 p. .
  22. Influence of fracture toughness on the wear resistance of yttriadoped zirconium oxide. T E Fischer , M P Anderson , S Jahanmir . J Am Ceram Soc 1989. 72 (2) p. .
  23. , W D Gates , A M D?az , Saj Aqu?l?no . Prosthetic Dent 1993. 69 p. 12.
  24. , West Sussex . 1990. p. .
  25. Vander varstPGTh, de With B. Grain-size dependence of sliding wear in tetragonal zirconia polycrystals. Y He , L Winnubst , A J Burggraaf , H Verweij . J Am Ceram Soc 1996. 79 (12) p. .
  26. Influence of porosity on friction and wear of tetragonal zirconia polycrystal. Y He , L Winnubst , A J Burggraaf , H Verweij , Vander Varstpgth . J Am Ceram Soc 1997. de With B. 80 (2) p. .
  27. Enhanced mechanical properties by grain boundary strengthening in ultra-fine grained TZP ceramics. Y J He , A J Winnubst , C D Sagel-Ransijn , A J Burggraaf , H Verweij . J Eur Ceram Soc 1996. 16 (6) p. .
  28. Unlubrication friction and wear behaviour of zirconia ceramics. Y Sun , B Li , D Yang , T Wang , Y Sasaki , K I Shii . Wear 1998. 215 p. .
  29. Tribological properties of nanostructured and conventional WC-Co coatings deposited by plasma spraying. Y Zhu , K Yukimura , C Ding , P Zhang . Thin Solid Films 2001. 388 p. .
Notes
1
© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)
18.
. Strafford KN, Datta PK, Gray JS. Surface engineering practice processes, fundamentals and
Date: 2013-01-15