Investigation into the Effects of Surfactant on Itakpe Iron Concentrate Magnetic Fluids

Table of contents

1. Introduction

(Claracq et al., 2003)

. In recent times, MR fluids have found application in automobile and aerospace technology and they possess higher field induced particles than ER fluids, hence the preference for ER fluids (Jolley et al., 1996;Wereley, 1999).

Magnetic fluids can be made into solid structures at room temperature and turned liquid at slightly elevated temperature when paraffin based ferrofluid is used as the carrier liquid. Heating the fluid and cooling in the presence of a magnetic field will find application in solid magnetic nanostructures such as the gear-like structure (Jolley et al., 1999). Magnetorheological applications are generally classified as Shear mode where clutches and breaks are used; flow mode which includes shock absorbers and damper in medical devices and squeeze mode in vibration isolation systems in artificial limbs (Choi and Han, 2013). Several studies on magnetic fluid have been carried out with great engineering interest at room temperatures and more focus on the external magnetic field (electromagnets). However, other works have reported findings in small temperature ranges of 40 -45 o C in biomedical applications. This research therefore focuses on the effect of temperature (from room temperature to 70 o C and Iron concentrate of up to 25%) on permanent magnetic influenced ferrous particles in-situ Motor oil.

2. II.

3. Material and Methods

4. a) Equipment used

The

5. b) Ball-milling the Iron ore

Iron ore concentrates at different sizes were put in a milling machine and milled for approximately 50 hours until the size of the sample was reduced to very tiny(nano) particles.

6. c) SEM Analysis

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was conducted to get the following information about the sample (iron ore concentrate); external texture, chemical composition, crystalline structure, orientation of materials making up the sample.

7. d) Experimental Procedure

First a basis of 100g was taken as the primary measurement for the process. According to literature, the volume of a typical magnetic fluid is 5% magnetic solids, 10% surfactant and 85% carrier but for the purpose of this research work, different ratios will be experimented to get a relationship between the viscosity of the magnetic fluid and volume of surfactant.

100g (100% loading) of oil with 0g (0% loading) of the iron concentrate and 0g of surfactant was measured, the behaviour of the oil without magnetic solids or surfactants at 200 RPM of the oil was then taken at room temperature using the viscometer. An external magnetic field in form of an electromagnet was wound around the cup of the viscometer. It was then placed on the magnetic stirrer which also served as the heat source with constant temperature.

8. III.

9. Results and Discussions

The viscometer used for this process measured shear rates in millipascal-seconds (mpa-s) equivalent to centipoise (cP). (Joseph and Suresh, 2014). Figure 2 shows the total dispersion of the iron particles inside the iron concentrate. This gives the microscopic overview of the relationship between the distance and gray value of the iron concentrate particles.

Note: C Table 1

Figure 3 showed that at different loading (i.e. concentration) of the iron filings in the magnetic fluid, its viscosity also changed. From the experimental procedure, as the loading was increased, the fluid naturally became denser and it was that the increase in density meant the viscosity will increase. The figure above confirmed that assertion as it is seen that as the iron filing concentration increased, the viscosity also increased without the effect of an electromagnetic field (E.M.F), and with the effect of an E.M.F. This implies that an influence of an E.M.F affects the C hydrodynamic behavior of a magnetic fluid by increasing its density and hence its viscosity. From the figure 4, just like figure 3 it was seen that at different loading (i.e. concentration) of the iron filings in the magnetic fluid, its viscosity also changed. Also from the experimental procedure, as the loading was increased, the fluid naturally became denser and it was assumed that the increase in density meant the viscosity will increase. But in this case, it was quite different because of the addition of liquid soap which served as the surfactant. As the iron filing concentration increased, the viscosity also increased as usual even similar to figure 2 but here it was more uniform because of the influence of the surfactant. The addition of the surfactant reduced the surface tension of the fluid and also prevented aggregation or clumping of the iron particles at the bottom of the fluid, allowing them to be suspended and stable in all parts of the fluid (i.e. there's no separation between the solid and liquid nor agglomeration of particles is seen even under a strong magnetic field [www.sigma-hc.co.jp, 2015]. Also, it increases the shear stress (thickness) of the fluid and hence the viscosity.

10. IV. Conclusions and Recommendations

1. The Iron concentrates although with wide distribution of particle size showed prospects of magneto-rheology. 2. Magneto-rheology increases with Iron concentrate content in the motor oil up to 25%. 3. Surfactant has more influence on the viscosity of the fluid when under influence of weak magnetic effect.

a) Recommendations/Future work 1. A more efficient method to size-reduce the iron concentrate to uniform size in Nano scale rather than ball-milling for plenty hours. 2. Electromagnetic effect with higher and known magnetic strength will be used for future studies. Year 2019

( D D D D ) C

11. Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest associated with this work.

Figure 1. C
Lukman Y ? , Anakhu E. A. ? , Yesufu I. S. ? , Ajayi P. R. ? , Audu L. M. ¥ & Sule T.U.N § agnetic fluids are stable colloidal homogenous suspensions of magnetic nanoparticles around 10 nm in diameter) in an appropriate carrier (aqueous or non-aqueous) liquid. They are super magnetic because they are attracted by a magnetic field but retain no residual magnetism after the field is removed. Typical magnetic fluid consists of three main elements: magnetic particles, carrier liquid and surfactant. The quality of each determines the performance of the final product.The technological advances made in the last few years have greatly increased the quality of magnetic fluids and variously enhanced properties to serve the requirements of brakes, seismic dampers, human prosthesis [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetorheological_fluid, 2013], etc. The whole family of magnetic fluid consists of a large number of different types. The two most common magnetic fluids that have been widely used commercially are ferrofluid (FF) and Magnetorheological fluid (MR fluid) [Wang, 2014]. Another smart fluid, the Electro rheological fluid (ER fluid) which has almost the same function as MR fluid. The history of MR fluids dates to the 1940s when it was discovered by Jacob Rabinow of the US National Bureau of Standards fluids. Rabinow was inspired by Willis Winslow following a seminar on M electrorheological (ER) Fluids (Rao, 2001). A decade later saw MR patents surpassed that of the ERs and by the 1990s MR fluids moved from research and development to industrial application in areas of Shock absorbers and polishing machine
Figure 2. Figure 1 :Figure 2 :
12Figure 1: SEM Surface Image of Itakpe Iron Concentrate
Figure 3.
S/NO. MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER SOURCE
1 Motor Oil Ammasco synthetic 5w/30 Zaria Market
3 mm (1/8") x 12 mm
2 Magnetic Stirrer bars (½"),VWR Octagon Chemical Engineering Department, ABU Zaria
Spinbar
3 Weighing Balance Sauter Mode Chemical Engineering Department, ABU Zaria
4 Thermometer Chemical Engineering Department, ABU Zaria
5 Viscometer Fann Instrument Company, Model 35 Chemical Engineering Department, ABU Zaria
6 Iron Concentrate Itakpe Iron Mining Site, Kogi state Nigeria
7 Ball milling Machine Kere Soesterberg, 057748 Chemical Engineering Department, ABU Zaria
8 Scanning Electron Microscope Q30 Kaduna Geological Centre.
1

Appendix A

  1. , Fluids. Rheologica ACTA 43 p. .
  2. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH): Cancer treatment with AC magnetic field induced excitation of biocompatible super paramagnetic nanoparticles. Andreas Jordan , Regina Scholz , Peter Wust , Horst Fahling , Roland Felix . Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 1999. 1999. 201 p. .
  3. Ferrofluids: Synthetic Strategies, Stabilization, Physicochemical Features. Aswathy Joseph , Mathew Suresh . Issue 2014. 79 (10) .
  4. J Claracq , J Sarrazin , J P Montfort . Viscoelastic properties of magnetorheological, 2003.
  5. Commercial magneto-rheological devices. J D Carlson , D M Catanzarite , St , K A Clair . International Journal of Modern Physics B 1996. 10 p. .
  6. Design considerations for an automotive magnetorheological brake. K Karakoc , E J Park , A Suleman . Mechatronics 2008. 18 p. .
  7. Magnetorheological Fluid technology, Application in Vehicle Systems, Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW: CRC Press. (Suite 300)
  8. , Mark Jolly , R Carlson , David , Beth C Munoz . 1996.
  9. Magnetic fluid and nanoparticle applications to nanotechnology. Markus Zahn . Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2001. 2001. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 3 p. . (Printed in the Netherlands)
  10. Properties and applications of commercial magnetorheological fluids. M R Jolly , W B Jonathan , J D Carlson . Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1999. 10 p. .
  11. Hysteresis modeling of semi-active magnetorheological helicopter lag damper. N M Wereley , G M Kamath , V Madhavan . Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1999. 10 p. .
  12. Super-strong magnetorheological fluids. R Tao . R979-R999 PII: S0953-8984(01)21212-0. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001. 2001. 13.
  13. , Seung-Bok And Choi , Han , Young-Min . 2013.
  14. Viscoelastic properties of MR fluids. W H Li , G Chen , S H Yeo . Smart Materials and Structures 1999. 8 p. .
Notes
1
© 2019 Global Journals
Date: 2019-01-15