he Ready Made Garments (RMG) industry is the significant export -base (77%) for Bangladesh and it has a major impact on country's economy, as well as on society, because of a substantial number of worker involvement [8]. The RMG industries are continuously providing the single source of growth in Bangladesh's rapidly developing economy. Because of being technologically labor dependent, it has a large number of worker involvement, and most of them are female workers, so it helps in socio-economical development of the poverty-stricken fraction of the population of the country. Many reputed buyers prefer this country for manufacturing for lesser labor cost with high quality of products [2]. The RMG industries are getting very competitive to attract the well-known buyers, and in today's competitive era, the manufacturers mainly need to be concerned about time, cost, quality, and delivery [10]. It is obvious that assembling apparel is a highly laborious process where a great number of people participate. But it is a matter of consideration that all the labors performance and capability are not same. So capacity variation occurs very frequently as working capacity differs from man to man. As a result, the production system often gets very problematic to ensure its smoothness. In case of running the smooth production, sometimes some operators have been highlighted as the low performers who are producing less as well as creating problems for the others. The combination of the machines to the operators is needed to specify to make the best use of both of them. Taiichi Ohno, considering the father of Toyota Production System, created a lean manufacturing framework, which was on the basis of the idea of preserving (or increasing) value with less work. Anything that doesn't increase profit in the eye of the customer must be considered waste, or "Muda," and every effort should be made to eliminate that excess [9]. The acronym for the eight wastes is TIM WOODS. TIM WOODS stands for: Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Over-processing, Defects & Skills. Elimination of these eight wastes from production floor can help the manufacturers to produce the quality product with less material, higher efficiency, shorter lead time, and in a timely manner. The manufacturers can reduce approximately 43% lead time by implementing the lean technique in the sewing industry [1]. This paper addresses the application of these eight wastes of lean to identify the reasons for being a low performer and then the implementation of necessary tools and techniques to eliminate those findings.
ii.
Productivity is the measure of output per unit of input [3]. In garments sewing section, the operation breakdown of a garment consists of several long, medium and short operations and operators also allocated on those specific operations based on their performance and grade. Generally, critical procedures are taken care of by grade -A operators while semicritical by grade -B and the grade -C operators appointed to other types of working. The productivity of them can be measured by how they are using their allocated resources in a worthwhile manner e. g. time, energy, skill, etc. to achieve established goals based on the relationship between inputs and outputs. If operators don't make the best possible use of those resources skillfully and wisely, they can't get the results and accordingly line's total production and efficiency will fall. So, productivity improvement of individual operators is very superior.
The sewing line layout is a formation where sewing workstations are placed on the sewing floor to form a line (or batch) that works on a single style. Materials start flowing from the back to the front in a sequential order. All part sub-assemblies are started at the right time to be ready at the required time and kept moving until the finished product is available at the end of the assembly line. The line to be followed by the product during travel may be straight, U-shaped, circular or zigzag and the machines lay in the order in which they are to be used [3].
Workstation layout is the arrangement of the required items in a specified way at a designated area where specific job or jobs are performed. To do the operations within the least possible time, their handling movement needs to be the minimum. The components need to place within the nearest hand distance to the operators so that they can pick them simply. In the apparel industry, an ideal workstation layout should consist of minimum picking and disposal area, least movements and minimum length of every action.
The total work to be performed at a workstation is equal to the sum of the tasks assigned to the workstation. Balancing the line means jobs assigned to the workstations in a specified way so that each workstation has no more than can be done in the workstation cycle time, and so that unassigned (idle) time across all workstations minimizes. In a balanced line, materials will flow smoothly and no time will be lost in waiting for work. An appropriate balancing of a sewing line depends on the mechanism of work cell deign and it needs to be linked with the other decisions to function well.
Time study is a method of measuring work for recording the times of accomplishing specific tasks or its elements carried out under specified conditions. An operator does same operation throughout the day. Time study helps to define how much time is necessary for an operator to carry out the job at a defined rate of performance. The aim of time study is to establish a time for a qualified worker to do definite work under stated conditions and at a stated amount of working.
SMV stands for Standard Minute Value, which indicates a standard period, and within that a required amount of work needs to be done through following the standard procedure with worker's "standard performance". For measuring how much time is required for doing a definite amount of workload, proper SMV set up is needed in garments production floor. Standard Time = (Average observed time X Rating %) + Allowance%
Bundles consist of garment parts need to complete a specific operation of garment component [11]. In readymade garment manufacturing plants, the manufacturers install various types of sewing systems. Operation head chooses these systems depending on the volume of production, product categories and costeffectiveness of high tech machines. Among those "Progressive Bundle System (PBS)" is mostly installed sewing system till date. In this production system, bundles of cut pieces (bundle of 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 pieces) are moved manually to feed the line. Then inside the line, an operator himself drags the bundle from the side table and transfers the bundle to the next operator after completion of the work. Quality inspectors track the bundles if they are coming sequentially.
In a production sewing line, where supply gathered, production goes under capacity and lots of Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( ) Volume XVIII Issue II Version I 45 Year 2018 J garment's parts on specific workstation remain unattached, those areas are termed as bottleneck areas and which works as a constraint for smooth flow of production is termed as bottleneck [2].
A company's overall performance depends on the contribution of every employee, and a company is only as strong as its lowest-performing employees. Low performers are those who struggle to do his/her job according to the standard method and who is causing problems to the other operators in the whole section. The operators who normally take more time than established, produce lesser than target and causing bottlenecks, causing defects while doing the operation and reworks needed to be done, etc. are termed as low performers. Operation management can improve the low performers through identifying the causes they are facing and eliminating those and giving them the proper training so that they can understand their job very well.
Waste caused by moving things around. Too much transportation tends to increase costs, wastes time, increases the likelihood of product damage and deterioration and can result in poor communication. Limiting transportation waste can be easily addressed by sound judgmental efforts such as simplifying processes, repairing physical layouts, handling products less often, and making distances between workstations as short as possible.
Work in Process (WIP) Inventory is material between operations due to large lot production or processes with long cycle times. This waste occurs when there is supply more than real operators' demand, which masks real production. Approximately 60% of wastes occur in garments industry due to inventory [5].
Any excess movement that doesn't add value to the product, service or process [9]. The motion includes any unnecessary physical motions or walking by workers which diverts them from actual processing work.
Not or under-utilizing peoples' talents, skills, and knowledge can have a detrimental effect on an organization. Companies can experience great benefits when recognizing the value of skills and breakthrough performances from all levels and can suffer when not effectively engaging in the process.
This occurs whenever work has to stop for some reasons: because the next person in line is overwhelmed, because something broke down, because operators are waiting for approval of materials, or because they've run out of something.
vi. Overproduction Unnecessary production of more quantities than required can be termed as overproduction [1]. In some organizations, workers just blindly keep producing, even when those who receive their output either aren't ready for it or don't need it. Line balancing and improved work design can contribute primarily to reduce the waste of overproduction.
When a revise or redone of procedure or product happens for something because it wasn't correct at the first time or taking unneeded steps to process the parts, inefficiently processing due to the poor tool and product design, causing unnecessary motion and producing defects [10]. In the apparel industry, this waste relates to defects because operators often produce alterations on their operations and so rework needed to be done regularly.
viii. Defects Mistakes that require additional time, resources, and energy to fix. In a manufacturing process, a defect might involve a defective part that worker has to redo. Production of faulty parts or correction, repair or rework, scrap, replacement production, errors in paperwork, provision of incorrect information about the product, late delivery, and inspection mean extravagant handling, time, and effort.
iii.
This study was carried out in a reputed woven (top) garment industry situated at My mensingh in Bangladesh. In this study, a woven shirt (Men's Flannel shirt with two pockets and flaps) was analyzed, and the critical points were identified. There a line was selected where production was minimum compared to the others.
Here ten cycle times for each operation was recorded, and at the same time, the name of the operator or helper, attachment used and machine type was recorded in a time study template sheet. Before starting the time study, the breakdown of the progress of operation was done. After recording ten cycle times; average cycle time was calculated from which basic time or cycle time was found. Then from cycle time, the potential capacities per hour and performance% were calculated.
There are eight types of wastes which are following: The calculated data visibly highlighted the low performers based on their performances and capacities and bottleneck areas were found out. Analyzing the data, seven (7) operators were selected for whom happening. They were selected for the further experimentation to be improved. The picked seven low performers with their potential capacity and performance against standard time data are given below:
For the improvement purposes, low performers can be defined as someone who is not achieving necessary QUALITY or QUANTITY; this could be either a trainee or a line machinist. An action flow chart is followed to observe what needs to take into consideration of the performing procedures. The flow chart is in the following:
After that lean tool of wastes has been applied and the findings of every operation are listed below: The above study elucidated information that operators are working with many types of wastes in their workstations. The primary problems came out from the research were excessive motion, poor methods following and line unbalancing, unorganized workstation layout and high defect rates, etc. By using the lean tool, the wastes which were unnecessary in the sewing section had been found out. Those wastes were working as barriers against faster and improved production. By eliminating of those wastes, operators overall performance improvement, their capacity enhancement, performance improvement can be perceived, and with the improvement of those individual operators, the ultimate line's productivity could be increased. But after finding the wastes, then some steps needed to take into action to remove those specific problems and operators also should know those barriers what were hindering themselves not to reach to their goals.
Several actions were taken to rectify the problems from each operator.
To remove the wastes, the applied actions are presented in the following table. 1. Change in line layout and workstation layout to fix the operator's position nearer to the pocket pressing operator so that she doesn't have to wait so long to receive.
Front Sharmin 5 2. Operator previously received bundle in a randomly manner where body parts being half folded consisting of pocket parts inside. Now, they will receive pocket parts only from pressing operator according to bundle number where front parts will be received from the Top & Bottom Placket operators in a straight formation according to the sizes and same bundle no.
3. The extra capacity of side label attach operator sometimes used to unwrap the paper from the pocket parts. 4. This operator is also performing low because of high defect rates. So she is instructed by the trainers, technician & line quality controller. 1. The operator is taking approximately 18-20 bursts to do one operation. So she is instructed where she is taking the extra bursts & how can she reduce them. 2. Previously operator has to cut the sleeve pairs firstly before starting the operation. Now sleeve match operator is instructed to do it.
2. The extra capacity of side label attach operator sometimes used to unwrap the paper from the pocket parts.
3. This operator's wrong handling movement causing defects sometimes. Besides extra time is taken to align the parts. So standard method & operational breakdown time is ensured.
1. Operator previously received bundle in a randomly manner where body parts being half folded consisting of pocket parts inside. Now, they will receive pocket parts only from pressing operator according to bundle number where front parts will be received from the Top & Bottom Placket operators in a straight formation according to the sizes and same bundle no. Attach Pocket to Front Lily 4 Attach Sleeve to Body Rokeya 6 2. The sleeve placket attach operators instruected to stitch one tack at sleeve and then cuff join operator has to stitch one tack only with joining 1. One rack is arranged where all unattached cuffs will be gathered accordingly.
3. A trainer is allocated there to teach her the proper instruction 3. The extra capacity of cuff top st. Operator is used to sort out the cuff with bodies according to sizes and numbers. 4. Sleeve match operator is instructed to give a mark in the sleeve pairs so that cuff join operator can join the cuffs with sleeves evenly.
Attach Cuff with 2 Pleat 7 work. Most garment workers repeat the same or similar
Operator Operation Actions Taken e) Workstation layout standardization A well-designed workstation is essential for productive work. Most garment workers repeat the same or similar tasks throughout each shift, which, if performed efficiently and quickly, can result in higher productivity. Further, each workstation should be designed to suit the needs of the particular worker (dependent upon height, reach, size, etc.) and take into account the types of machine they are using and the works they are performing [4]. A well-organized workstation (and workplace) that is well-lit, free from chemical hazards and noise, and that minimizes material handling, will improve efficiency and reduce worker fatigue. Sometimes even minor ergonomic changes in the design of equipment, workstations or job tasks, which cost very little can make significant improvements in worker comfort, health, safety, and productivity. The most workstation layouts of the low performing operators were unorganized and to improve their productivity, workstation layout must need to be updated. The changes in workstation layouts with upgraded methods for low performing operators are attached below: Here with changing operator's workstation layout, they also sent to training to improve their performance and handling movement and also motivation was done to improve their activity level. A change in operation breakdown & line layout was also done. Finally to improve their working condition and to increase the overall sectional productivity, some workloads were given to the higher capacity workers considering the layout. Thus the bottlenecks were solved; the changes improved the performance and capacity of those low performers because of the reduction of their working operation time and the enhancement in productivity. The following tables in result & discussion section show the updated outcome of the examined operators, the summary of the operators' performance & capacity improvement and overall line's productivity and efficiency improvement. iv.
By analyzing the sewing line's condition and operator's psychology, training arranged to motivate the workers as well as they trained on how to work consciously and efficiently. On that training, they learned about the reasons for being low performers and what steps to take to avoid the condition. Operators were taught about the operational procedure standardization, maintain the quality and quantity on the required time and how to reduce the excessive movements to avoid fatigue. Supervisors also trained on understanding operational breakdown, operation bulleting, line balancing and the ways to monitor the operators effectively.
Here the improvements regarding capacity, efficiency, productivity and performance of the operators as well as the sewing line after the actions of method standardization, process improvement, line balancing and training took place are stated in the following.
Line Efficiency = (Total Production X SMV X 100) / (No. of Operator X Working Hour X 60) Before improvement line efficiency: = (58 X 28.38 X 100) / (51 X 1 X 60) = 53.79% After improvement line efficiency: = (66 X 28.38 X 100) / (51 X 1 X 60) = 61.21%
Efficiency improved through the rise of the production/hr by improving the operator; balancing the line and reducing bottleneck. increased. Besides, operators defect rates also reduced. Rework times for fixing the defects was also decreased and thus operators could use the maximum time provided to her to reach their goals. Summaries based on time study charts before and after the actions, changes due to the improvement to the line as well as operators and bar chart on the low performing operator's performance improvement are shown in the following.
From the above discussion and time study charts, it is noticeable that by improving the low performers, manufacturers can achieve the overall line's progress.
By applying time study technique, method improvement, balancing techniques, and training the bottleneck operations were developed as well as the line efficiency improved from 53.79% to 61.21%. Line's productivity previously was 29%,
In apparel industries, it is sometimes very complicated to identify the causes behind the low performance of the operators, and also the key areas to select and improve, which can change the current system and process. In today's competitive world, delivering the high-quality garments at low cost in shorter lead times are the uppermost challenges faced by apparel manufacturers [6]. So the maximum capacity utilization of the operators needs to be ensured to meet the target. Generally, operators have to do their operations in a hurry and mostly by being in a fixed position, which is unlike from their natural life [7]. So the work environment needs to be suited and well-organized to them as much as possible. Considering these facts, working station standardization to make operators comfortable and feel them free to work is very much necessary to receive the maximum output with acceptable quality from them. In addition to these, sewing line also needs to be very much balanced to maximize hourly production capacity. By ensuring the proper work distribution among the operators, the targeted output can be achieved without having overtime. Even a minor policy change to the sewing floor or any specific operation can result in very positively. Therefore, the similar type apparel industries, those who want to recognize and rectify their problems, and expect for the better production efficiency through the improvement of the low performing operators, the research outcomes can be worthwhile and beneficial to them.
Sl. No. Operator Name | Operation Name | Machine Code SMV Capacity CT Capacity/Hr Performance% | |||||
1 | Julekha | Attach Collar Band to Collar | 1N2TLS-EC | 0.56 | 0.85 | 71 | 65.88% |
2 | Khaleda | Make Front Left Placket (Top Placket) | 4N8TCS-Kan | 0.35 | 0.69 | 87 | 50.72% |
3 | Nasrin | Press Pocket (Auto) | Creasing m/c | 0.41 | 0.83 | 72 | 49.40% |
4 | Lily | Attach Pocket to Front | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.22 | 2.45 | 24 | 49.80% |
5 | Sharmin | Attach Pocket to Front | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.22 | 2.59 | 23 | 47.10% |
6 | Rokeya | Attach Sleeve to body | 2N4TCS | 0.93 | 1.83 | 33 | 50.82% |
7 | Tahmina | Attach Cuff with 2 Pleats | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.81 | 1.46 | 41 | 55.48% |
Operator Name | Operation Name | 8 Wastes of Lean | Effective (Y/N) | Findings | |
Transportation | Y | After 2-3 bundle completion, operator herself needs to go to the collar band rolling operator to collect the next bundles | |||
Inventory | Y | The made collars from collar make operator and the lower part from cutting section stored beside her on the center table | |||
Attach | Motion | Y | Using trimmer 4-6 times for levelling the parts accordingly during the operation | ||
1 | Julekha | Collar Band | Waiting | N | |
to Collar | Over Production | N | |||
Over Processing | Y | As the bundles parts remain randomly on the center table, operator is matching the all 3 parts with one to another according to the cutting serial no. and bundle no. | |||
Defects | Y | Notch uneven | |||
Skills | N | ||||
Transportation | N | ||||
Inventory | Y | Front parts directly coming from the cutting department gathered right beside her | |||
Motion | Y | Approximately taking 5 bursts to complete each operation | |||
Make Front | Waiting | N | |||
2 | Khaleda | Placket) Left Placket (Top | Over Production Over Processing | N Y | and affter completion of every bundle, she is checking if the check matches with each other Operator has to control the fabric during operation because the fabric is slipping out from the machine |
Defects | Y | Raw edge out, Check match uneven, High-Low | |||
Skills | N | ||||
Transportation | Y | At the end of bundle completion, operator has to stand & move towards the center table to dispose the pressed parts. | |||
Inventory | Y | Approximately 3-6 bundles stored on her side from pocket hemming operator | |||
3 | Nasrin | Press Pocket (Auto) | Motion Waiting | Y N | She is picking the pocket parts from the inside of the body parts and also disposing it into the front body parts after the operation |
Over Production | N | ||||
Over Processing | Y | At the end of every pocket pressing, she is unwrapping paper or tissue everytime | |||
Defects | N | ||||
Skills | N | ||||
Transportation | N | ||||
Inventory | N | ||||
Motion | Y | Excess movement to check match and to match the diamond shapes | |||
Attach | Waiting | Y | Waiting to recieve bundles from the pressing operator | ||
4 | Lily | Pocket to | Over Production | N | |
Front | Over Processing | Y | front parts, align & then sew Bundles coming to her by being half folded, she needs to open up, take the pocket parts, straighten the | ||
Defects | Y | Check mismatch, High-Low in pockets, Slanted in diamond shapes etc. | |||
Skills | N | ||||
Transportation | Y | Far from pressing operator and so relying on the other operator to pass her the next bundle | |||
Inventory | N | ||||
5 | Sharmin | Attach Pocket to Front | Motion Waiting Over Production Over Processing | Y Y N Y | Taking 7 instead of 4 standard bursts Waiting to recieve bundles from the pressing operator front parts, align & then sew Bundles coming to her by being half folded, she needs to open up, take the pocket parts, straighten the |
Defects | Y | Check mismatch, Pocket alignment uneven etc. | |||
Skills | N |
Sl. No. | Operator Operation | Actions Taken | |
2. A stand placed at the operators right side | |||
Attach | 3. Fix the standard of using 2-3 pokes by trimmers for alignment during the operation | ||
1 | Julekha | to Collar Collar Band | the all 3 parts 4. The extra capacity of the Collar Band Hemming operator & Collar Midline T/S is used to match |
5. 1. Supervisor instructed to place only 5 bundles beside that operator in order to keep the | |||
workstation free and clean | |||
2 | Khaleda Box Placket | ||
3 | Nasrin | Pocket Press |
Sl. No. | Operator Name | Operation Name | S.M.V | M/C | Capacity Cycle Time | Potential r Capacity/H | Performance (%) |
1 | Rozina | Collar Make | 0.45 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.58 | 103 | 77.59% |
2 | Tanzina | Trim, Turn & Press Collar | 0.35 | Collar Press | 0.4 | 150 | 87.50% |
3 | Rubina | Collar Top St | 0.34 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.37 | 162 | 91.89% |
4 | Ruzina | Hem Cuff | 0.45 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.56 | 107 | 80.36% |
5 | Ruzina | Hem Collar Band | 0.26 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.35 | 171 | 74.29% |
6 | Rima | Cuff make | 0.55 | 1N2TLS-EC | 0.72 | 83 | 76.39% |
7 | Robina | Press Cuff | 0.26 | Cuff Press M/C | 0.29 | 207 | 89.66% |
8 | Rohima | Cuff top st. | 0.39 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.47 | 128 | 82.98% |
9 | Julekha | Attach Collar Band to Collar | 0.56 | 1N2TLS-EC | 0.85 | 71 | 65.88% |
10 | Taslima | Collar Midline top st. with turn | 0.44 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.48 | 125 | 91.67% |
11 | Nurunnahar | Trim excess collar | 0.16 | 1N3TOL | 0.19 | 316 | 84.21% |
12 | Shanta | Mark at Collar Band | 0.17 | Collar Notcher | 0.21 | 286 | 80.95% |
13 | Abdul Alim | Press Front Flap | 0.5 | Press M/C | 0.59 | 102 | 84.75% |
14 | Moriom | Flap top st | 0.88 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.19 | 50 | 73.95% |
15 | Ruma | Flap top st | 0.88 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.32 | 45 | 66.67% |
16 | Suma | Bottom placket | 0.3 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.43 | 140 | 69.77% |
17 | Kohinur | Attach Side label | 0.39 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.44 | 136 | 88.64% |
18 | Khaleda | Box placket | 0.35 | 4N8TCS-Kan | 0.69 | 87 | 50.72% |
19 | Sabina | Press Front Right Placket | 0.16 | FUMC | 0.18 | 333 | 88.89% |
20 | Mala | Pocket hem | 0.35 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.45 | 133 | 77.78% |
21 | Nasrin | Press Pocket | 0.41 | Creasing M/C | 0.83 | 72 | 49.40% |
22 | Eity | Attach Pocket to Front | 1.22 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.65 | 36 | 73.94% |
23 | Sharmin | Attach Pocket to Front | 1.22 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 2.45 | 24 | 49.80% |
24 | Lily | Attach Pocket to Front | 1.22 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 2.59 | 23 | 47.10% |
25 | Lakhy | Flap attach | 0.42 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 0.69 | 87 | 60.87% |
26 | Romicha | Attach Back Yoke with Pleat use folder | 0.65 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 0.78 | 77 | 83.33% |
27 | Chameli | Attach Main Label | 0.39 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.52 | 115 | 75.00% |
28 | Moriom | Join Shoulder by Folder | 0.72 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 0.95 | 63 | 75.79% |
29 | Asma | Join Shoulder by Folder | 0.72 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.02 | 59 | 70.59% |
30 | Taslima | Attach Collar to Body | 0.56 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.71 | 85 | 78.87% |
31 | Papiya | Collar close to Body | 0.59 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.79 | 76 | 74.68% |
32 | Fatema | Attach Sleeve Tape | 0.28 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.39 | 154 | 71.79% |
33 | Amena | Tack Sleeve Tape with Cut Excess | 0.26 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.3 | 200 | 86.67% |
34 | Sabrina | Press Sleeve Placket | 0.2 | FUMC | 0.24 | 250 | 83.33% |
35 | Amina | Attach Sleeve placket | 0.49 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.55 | 109 | 89.09% |
36 | Moushumi | Attach Sleeve placket | 0.49 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.58 | 103 | 84.48% |
37 | Asha | Match Sleeve to Body | 0.23 | Plain Table | 0.29 | 207 | 79.31% |
38 | Rokeya | Sleeve attach | 0.93 | 2N4TCS | 1.83 | 33 | 50.82% |
39 | Marufa | Sleeve attach | 0.93 | 2N4TCS | 1.42 | 42 | 65.49% |
40 | Fahima | Side seam | 0.88 | 2N4TCS-FOA | 1.23 | 49 | 71.54% |
41 | Ojufa | Side seam | 0.88 | 2N4TCS-FOA | 1.42 | 42 | 61.97% |
42 | Momena | Bottom Hem | 0.69 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.89 | 67 | 77.53% |
43 | Mahmuda | Bottom Hem | 0.69 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.95 | 63 | 72.63% |
44 | Tahmina | Cuff join | 0.81 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 1.46 | 41 | 55.48% |
45 | Monira | Cuff Join | 0.81 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 1.33 | 45 | 60.90% |
46 | Jesmin | Button Hole | 0.66 | 1N2TLS-BH | 0.71 | 85 | 92.96% |
47 | Kona | Collar and Placket holing | 0.67 | 1N2TLS-BH | 0.73 | 82 | 91.78% |
48 | Rukhsana | Bartack | 0.48 | 1N2TLS-BT | 0.53 | 113 | 90.57% |
49 | Tulshi | Mark Button Attach | 0.38 | Plain Table | 0.42 | 143 | 90.48% |
50 | Akhi | Button Attach | 0.68 | 1N2TLS-BA | 0.74 | 81 | 91.89% |
51 | Ruma | Button attach on neck and sleeve placket | 0.63 | 1N2TLS-BA | 0.69 | 87 | 91.30% |
Sl. No. | Operator Name | Operation Name | S.M.V | M/C | Capacity Cycle Time | Potential Capacity/Hr | Performance (%) |
1 | Rozina | Collar Make | 0.45 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.58 | 103 | 77.59% |
2 | Tanzina | Trim, Turn & Press Collar | 0.35 | Collar Press | 0.4 | 150 | 87.50% |
3 | Rubina | Collar Top St | 0.34 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.37 | 162 | 91.89% |
4 | Ruzina | Hem Cuff | 0.45 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.56 | 107 | 80.36% |
5 | Bilkis | Hem Collar Band | 0.26 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.39 | 154 | 66.67% |
6 | Rima | Cuff make | 0.55 | 1N2TLS-EC | 0.72 | 83 | 76.39% |
7 | Robina | Press Cuff | 0.26 | Cuff Press M/C | 0.29 | 207 | 89.66% |
8 | Rohima | Cuff top st. | 0.39 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.47 | 128 | 82.98% |
9 | Julekha | Attach Collar Band to Collar | 0.56 | 1N2TLS-EC | 0.73 | 82 | 76.71% |
10 | Taslima | Collar Midline top st. with turn | 0.44 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.48 | 125 | 91.67% |
11 | Nurunnahar | Trim excess collar | 0.16 | 1N3TOL | 0.19 | 316 | 84.21% |
12 | Shanta | Mark at Collar Band | 0.17 | Collar Notcher | 0.21 | 286 | 80.95% |
13 | Abdul Alim | Press Front Flap | 0.5 | Press M/C | 0.59 | 102 | 84.75% |
14 | Moriom | Flap top st | 0.88 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.19 | 50 | 73.95% |
15 | Ruma | Flap top st | 0.88 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.29 | 47 | 68.22% |
16 | Suma | Bottom placket | 0.3 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.43 | 140 | 69.77% |
17 | Kohinur | Side label | 0.39 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.44 | 136 | 88.64% |
18 | Khaleda | Box placket | 0.35 | 4N8TCS-Kan | 0.53 | 113 | 66.04% |
19 | Sabina | Press Front Right Placket | 0.16 | FUMC | 0.18 | 333 | 88.89% |
20 | Mala | Pocket hem | 0.35 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.45 | 133 | 77.78% |
21 | Nasrin | Press Pocket | 0.41 | Creasing M/C | 0.62 | 97 | 66.13% |
22 | Eity | Attach Pocket to Front | 1.22 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.65 | 36 | 73.94% |
23 | Sharmin | Attach Pocket to Front | 1.22 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.85 | 32 | 65.95% |
24 | Lily | Attach Pocket to Front | 1.22 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 2.18 | 28 | 55.96% |
25 | Lakhy | Flap attach | 0.42 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 0.69 | 87 | 60.87% |
26 | Romicha | Attach Back Yoke with Pleat use folder | 0.65 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 0.78 | 77 | 83.33% |
27 | Chameli | Main Label | 0.39 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.52 | 115 | 75.00% |
28 | Moriom | Join Shoulder by Folder | 0.72 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 0.95 | 63 | 75.79% |
29 | Asma | Join Shoulder by Folder | 0.72 | 2N4TLS-UBT | 1.02 | 59 | 70.59% |
30 | Taslima | Attach Collar to Body | 0.56 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.71 | 85 | 78.87% |
31 | Papiya | Collar close | 0.59 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.79 | 76 | 74.68% |
32 | Fatema | Attach Sleeve Tape | 0.28 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.39 | 154 | 71.79% |
33 | Amena | Tack Sleeve Tape with Cut Excess | 0.26 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.3 | 200 | 86.67% |
34 | Sabrina | Press Sleeve Placket | 0.2 | FUMC | 0.24 | 250 | 83.33% |
35 | Amina | Attach Sleeve placket | 0.49 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.63 | 95 | 77.78% |
36 | Moushumi | Attach Sleeve placket | 0.49 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.69 | 87 | 71.01% |
37 | Asha | Match Sleeve to Body | 0.23 | Plain Table | 0.38 | 158 | 60.53% |
38 | Rokeya | Sleeve attach | 0.93 | 2N4TCS | 1.59 | 38 | 58.49% |
39 | Marufa | Sleeve attach | 0.93 | 2N4TCS | 1.42 | 42 | 65.49% |
40 | Fahima | Side seam | 0.88 | 2N4TCS-FOA | 1.23 | 49 | 71.54% |
41 | Ojufa | Side seam | 0.88 | 2N4TCS-FOA | 1.42 | 42 | 61.97% |
42 | Momena | Bottom Hem | 0.69 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.89 | 67 | 77.53% |
43 | Mahmuda | Bottom Hem | 0.69 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 0.95 | 63 | 72.63% |
44 | Tahmina | Cuff join | 0.81 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 1.08 | 56 | 75.00% |
45 | Monira | Cuff Join | 0.81 | 1N2TLS-UBT | 1.33 | 45 | 60.90% |
46 | Jesmin | Button Hole | 0.66 | 1N2TLS-BH | 0.71 | 85 | 92.96% |
47 | Kona | Collar and Placket holing | 0.67 | 1N2TLS-BH | 0.73 | 82 | 91.78% |
48 | Rukhsana | Bartack | 0.48 | 1N2TLS-BT | 0.53 | 113 | 90.57% |
49 | Tulshi | Mark Button Attach | 0.38 | Plain Table | 0.42 | 143 | 90.48% |
50 | Akhi | Button Attach | 0.68 | 1N2TLS-BA | 0.74 | 81 | 91.89% |
51 | Ruma | Button attach on neck and sleeve placket | 0.63 | 1N2TLS-BA | 0.69 | 87 | 91.30% |
Parameter | Before | After | ||||||
Line Efficiency | 53.79% | 61.21% | ||||||
Line Productivity | 29% | 44% | ||||||
Operators Avg. Performance | 76.16% | 77.05% | ||||||
Bottleneck | 5 | 0 | ||||||
Sl. No. | Operator Name | Operation | Before Cycle Time (in second) After | Performance Improvement % | Before After Potential Pieces | |||
1 Julekha Attach Collar Band to Collar | 51 | 43.8 | 10.83% | 71 | 82 | |||
2 Khaleda | Box Placket | 41.4 | 31.8 | 15.32% | 87 | 113 | ||
3 | Nasrin | Press Pocket | 49.8 | 37.2 | 16.73% | 72 | 97 | |
4 Sharmin Attach Pocket to Front | 147 | 111 | 16.15% | 24 | 32 | |||
5 | Lily | Attach Pocket to Front | 155.4 | 130.8 | 8.86% | 23 | 28 | |
6 Rokeya | Sleeve Attach | 109.8 | 95.4 | 7.67% | 33 | 38 | ||
7 Tahmina | Cuff Join | 87.6 | 64.8 | 19.52% | 41 | 56 | ||
Average Improvement | 13.58% |
Ergonomic Evaluation of the Workstations in a Garment Manufacturing Industry -An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering 2320-2092. 2014. 2 (4) .
Application of Modular Manufacturing System in Garments Industry. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 2229-5518. 2013. 4.
Improving Sewing Section Efficiency through Utilization of Worker Capacity by Time Study Technique. 10.5923/j.textile.20150401.01. International Journal of Textile Science 2015. 4 (1) p. .
Impacts of Lean Tools & Techniques for Improving Manufacturing Performance in Garments Manufacturing Scenario: A Case Study. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology 0976-3945.
Application of Lean Manufacturing to Higher Productivity in the Apparel Industry in Bangladesh. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 2013. 4 (2) p. .
Lean Manufacturing Implementation in the Sewing Industry. Journal of Enterprise Transformation 1948-8289. 2014.
Design of Work Place and Ergonomics in Garment Enterprises. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, 2015. 2015.