Propertis Porous Asphalt used Quarsite Dolomite Stone with Buton Natural Asphalt After Loading

Table of contents

1. Introduction

ermeable asphalt pavement or porus friction course is commonly knews as porous asphalt. The porous pavement is commonly used in Europe and Japan. The pavement cousist in a porous overlay and then to drain on he edges to the pavement (Michael. E Barret. Ph.D). The lot deposit of Quarsite Dolomite Stone in Indonesia was still not be exploited better. Among the exiting utilization of it most of it was exploited for traditional needs fireplace material, some last rasearch in the field of road construction showed that Quarsite Dolomite Stone was powerfull enough when mixtured material for pavemen stabilization. Quarsite Dolomite Stone is local material from sea location in the island of banggai half Sulawesi Indonesia. Its was kwarsit Dolomitan material Celebes (Car Donald, 1985). This Experimental be done for mesuring propertis permeability asphalt pavement with using Quarsite Dolomite Stone as Local material who was come from sea location at the Banggai Island half Celebes Indonesia with used Rice Hash as Filler.

As course agregate on the surface layer Road Pavement. Capasity drain porous Asphalt were Author: Doctor Civil Enginering from Hasanuddin University, in duty Atma Jaya University Makassar. e-mail: [email protected].

connecting correlasion with spacing hight and small porousity in structure Asphalt. Stability and Durability and Hydrolic conductivity its must be hight test than 20% (Ruz. et. al, 1990 ). Asphalt porous is open graded course Aggregate. Porousity asphalt porous (10%-15%) the structure made drain for flow water (Nur Ali, et al. 2005).

Aggregate was specimen mineral who was done for mixture road konstruktion in the asphalt pavement it's mush be 90%-95% for the total weight strukture or 77%-85% for all volume (Alkin, et. al 1997).

Clasification agregate be measured by spacing at all : course aggregate it must be lost for filter No.8 it is higher than 2,36 mm.

2. Literature Review

Two different test, the indirect tensile test (IDT) and the semi-circular bending test (SCB) were performed on a Permeable asphalt pavement. The mixture was a 10 mm nominal maximum size produced with limestone and marly limestone, calcarenite, and fine and coarse sand. It has 6.5% (±0.5%) air void and 5.4% design asphalt content, produced with 60/70 PEN virgin bitumen. Specimens were compacted using a Superpave Gyratory compactor at N = 109 revolutions to produce a 6500 g, 150 mm diameter Gyratory-compacted specimen. Specimens 150 mm diameter by 25 mm thick were used to perform Superpave IDT test with the system developed by Roque and Buttlar [9,10]. Some of these thin specimens were sliced to obtain 75 mm height semi circular specimens in order to conduct SCB test.

The tests were performed on three replicates at 10 o C using an MTS closed-loop servo-hydraulic loading system. The experimental set-up of each test is shown in Fig. 1.

3. a) The indirect tensile test (IDT)

The IDT loads monotoniealiy a 152 mm diameter circular specimen to failure applying a constant stroke of 0.084 mm/s. Two strain gauges with a length of 38.1 mm are placed at the centre of the specimen to measure vertical and horizontal deformations during loading. The horizontal stress occurring at the centre of the specimen is computed using the following IDT plane stress equation, according to the superpave indirect tension test procedure [9,10]: ?h= 2P/?Dt where: ?h tensile stress at the centre of the specimens, P load of the specimen, D diameter of the specimen, t thickness of the specimen.

In addition, the procedure developed by Roque and Buttlar [9,10] was used to calculate horizontal and vertical strains at the center of the specimen from horizontal and vertical train gauge measurements.

4. III.

5. Materials and Methods

6. a) Indirect Testing

Permeable asphalt pavement was produced with used Quarsite Dolomite Stone as course aggregate. The Quarsite Dolomite Stone broked in the spacing 3/8" ½"-¾" with the BNA Blend Pertamina penetration 60/70. Briket at the Bitumen be done as the standard variation asphalt 3%, 3,5%, 4%, and 5% for testing experimental Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) and Catambro Lost. We was controlling testing for composition asphalt permeable pavement with Standar National Indonesia (SNI) and American Association for Testing and Material (ASTM), Permeability and Marshal Test with asphalt variation 4-7% integral spacing 1% who use variation open gradation. Asphalt optimum standar is 4% be used to controlling variation asphalt. For optimum asphalt test be use variation asphalt 3% -5% with spacing 5%.

For open gradation we use lost aggregate ¾", ½" and lost filter by comparative 50 : 50. Fine aggregate we use filter number 4, finally number 200, we used 10%. BNA Blend Pertamina we use all variation asphalt category: 3%, 3.5%, 4%, 4.5% and 5%. Test Indirect Tensil Strength (ITS) be controlling by ASTM D6931-07.

7. b) Mix Design Permeable Asphalt Pavement Testing

Mix design permeable asphalt pavement the used composition open graded sistem. Who was Mix Trial Gradation lost of material ¾", 1/2 " be stoped filter ½" and lost of material ½" be stoped filter 3/8" with composition comparative 50-50 to course aggregate. The used fine aggregate lost filter number 4, and stoped filter number 200 all of 10% for mould capacity. Asphalt Blend Pertamina the use variation standard 3%, 3.5%, 4%, 4.5% and 5%. Briket make in for 10 cm and depth + 6.5cm and Briket make in 40x40 cm, depth + 6.5cm. 1. Indirect tensile strength 0,1140 MPa for total load 125 Kgf, for the quality asphalt 3% R maks 0,0180. Indirect tensile strength 0, 2483 MPa for total load 275 Kgf, for the quality asphalt 3.5% R maks 0,0234. Indirect tensile strength 0, 3574 MPa for total load 400 Kgf, for the quality asphalt 4% R maks 0, 0283. Indirect tensile strength 0, 2927 MPa for total load 325 Kgf, for the quality asphalt 4.5% R maks 0,0253. Indirect tensile strength 0,2346 MPa for total load 250 Kgf, for the quality asphalt 5% R maks 0,0225.

Figure 1. Figure 1 :
1Figure 1 : Permeable Friction Course
Figure 2. Figure 2 :
2Figure 2 : Quarsite Dolomite Stone (Local Containe of Banggai island in half celebes )
Figure 3. Figure 6 :
6Figure 6 : Test Indirect Tensile Strength
Figure 4. Figure 12 :Figure 13 :
1213Figure 12 : Correlation quality asphalt with Indirect Tensile Strength
Figure 5. Figure 9 :
9Figure 9 : Permeable asphalt pavement
Figure 6. Figure 14 :Figure 16 :
1416Figure 14 : Corelation ITS Value and R value 3%
Figure 7. Figure 17 :
17Figure 17 : Corelation ITS Value and R value 4.5%
Figure 8. Figure 19 :
19Figure 19 : Corelation quality asphalt with value cantabro loss
Figure 9. Table 2 :
2
Percen Diameter High Load
Sam pel tage asphalt quality (%) briket mm Briket mm Value (P) kgf ITS Value Mpa
D H
I 102.3 66.9 0
II 102.22 69.3 75.00 0.066134591
III 102 68.5 100.00 0.089401701
Figure 10. Table 4 :
4
Sam pel Percen tage quality asphal Wei ght before test (Gram) Mo Weight after test (Gram) (Gram) (%) Loss Loss Weight Weight Mi L
I 1081 244 837.00 77.43
II 1083 248 835.00 77.10
III IV V 3.0 1090 1091 1070 281 226 241 809.00 865.00 829.00 74.22 79.29 77.48
Average 77.10
I II 1085 1089 731 760 354.00 329.00 32.63 30.21
III IV V 3.5 1071 1069 1088 748 711 705 323.00 358.00 383.00 30.16 33.49 35.20
Average 32.34
I II III 4.0 1081 1082 1088 913 936 931 168.00 146.00 157.00 15.54 13.49 14.43
IV V 1086 1090 944 913 162.00 177.00 13.09 16.24
Average 14.56
I II 1084 1082 959 952 125.00 130.00 11.53 12.01
III IV 4.5 1086 1088 940 961 146.00 127.00 13.44 11.67
V I II III IV V 5.0 1084 Average 1075 1084 1090 1078 1105 Average 948 956 968 984 994 1003 136.00 119.00 116.00 106.00 84.00 102.00 12.55 12.24 11.07 10.70 9.72 7.79 9.23 9.70
Note: E © 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US)
Figure 11.
2. Permeable asphalt pavement mixture for
Cantabro test we can see that optimum BNA Blend
Pertamina for the coarse agregate Quarsite
Dolomite Stone it was bigger porous when quality
asphalt 3%. Loss weight Cantabro 77.10%
correlation with quality asphalt 3%, loss weight
Cantabro 32,34% correlation with quality asphalt
3.5%, loss weight Cantabro 14,56% correlation with
quality asphalt 4%, Loss weight Cantabro 12,24%
correlation with quality asphalt 4.5% and loss weight
Cantabro 9,70% correlation with quality asphalt 5%.
1. Allex Eduardo Alvarez Lugo, 2009, Improving Mix
Design and Construction of Permeable Friction
Course Mixtures. Disserttion Departmen of Civil
Enginering Texas University.
2. He Gui Ping, Wong Wing Gun, 2006. Effects of
Moisture On Strength and Permanent Deformation
of Foamed Asphalt Mix Incorporating Rap
Materials. Journal of Constraction and Building
Materials.
3. Hao Ying, 2008, Using X-Ray Computed
Tomography to Quantity Damage of Hot-Mix
Asphalt in The Dynamic Complex Modulus and
Flow Number.
4. Nur Ali, M. Wahid Tjaronge, Lawalenna
Samang and Muhammad Isran Ramli, Juni 2011.
"Experimental Study on Effects of Flood Puddle to
Durability of Asphaltic Concrete Containing
Refined Butonic Asphalt". The 9 th Eastern Asia for
Transportation Studies Coference, Jeju, South of
Korea.
5. Nielsen, C. B, E. Nielsen, J. B. Andersen and J.
Rasberg, 2004, "Develpment of Durabel Porous
Asphalt Mixes from Laboratory Experiment",
Proceeding of The 3 rd Euroasphalt and
Eurobitume Congress, Vienna.
6. Verhelst, F.A.D.B, Vervoort and G Marchal (1995).
X-Ray Computerized Determination of
Heterogeneties in Rock Samples.
7.
1

Appendix A

  1. US) Guidelines Handbook. www.GlobalJournals.org References Références Referencias Global Journals Inc 2016.
Notes
1
© 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US)
Date: 2016-05-15